abbotsbury

joined 2 years ago
[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

TLDR; after enough years and in a communicative enough relationship you don’t need verbal / explicit y/n as frequently.

The image says to avoid not consenting, not to avoid verbal nonconsent.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Your first phrase says op places the Entire lack of diversity on the lack of trolls

No, the person I replied to said that, they were replying to OP.

That’s quite black and white view from your part IMO.

If your answer to "where are the different opinions" is "no trolls," then you are putting the lack of diversity on trolls. Which is black and white, yes, and why I disagree with it.

Sometimes we have the tankie trolls here on lemmy too

Which is why "no trolls" is a bad answer to OP's question.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Things to avoid: No consent

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So is that your response to OP's question then? They're wrong about seemingly everyone agreeing because they are mistaking respect for agreement? They mention wanting to see dissenting opinions respectfully, so I don't think that's the case. They are talking about how the majority seems to be on the same wavelength, not that there is a lack of polarization. Again it seems like you have an answer to a question OP didn't ask ("Why aren't there more trolls and tribalism on the fediverse?") because that's what you want to talk about instead.

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (6 children)

But you're placing the entire lack of diverse opinions on the lack of trolls, which is wrong because it assigns all diverse opinions as troll opinions. Really I think you're just answering a different question than OP asked to frame it as a positive for the fediverse, which doesn't address the actual concerns. As you say, real life people are better at voicing different opinions, and this isn't an ad-supported network, so where are the non-troll different opinions?

I also gotta disagree with the idea that the fediverse is adverse to "user number go up!" mentality, the most common response to me saying a post is off topic or low quality or something is "it doesn't matter because we need more content to attract more users!"

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (8 children)

Not all different opinions are troll opinions

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

And the drone strikes

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Why is Havok only okay in Source?

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's slop now despite using AI code for some time?

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Anon got filtered by the Tree Guardian and is coping

[–] abbotsbury@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Ah yes, the hepcat

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for "Mass downvoting innocuous content," so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we're not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

view more: next ›