cecilkorik

joined 2 years ago
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 14 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

It's literally rotting people's brains. Like people are having actual mental deficiencies and psychotic breakdowns depending on how heavily they depend on this technology. I used to think it was merely digital pollution. I'm now starting to think it's actually worse than that, much worse.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

That sounds annoying. The old FF7 is also buggy, but mostly in funny and delightful ways.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

This is terrible I love it.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 6 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

Yup, they all have trailing slashes when viewed on Lemmy, and 3/4 have trailing slashes when viewed on piefed. So only piefed actually respects what was originally typed. Lemmy adds a trailing slash when you're adding the comment, and also adds a trailing slash when reading a comment posted that doesn't originally have a trailing slash. Intriguing (and slightly annoying).

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 4 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Very interesting I wonder what happens if I post both trailing and non-trailing options, do they both get canonized into the same format?

https://piefed.ca/ -- has a trailing slash https://piefed.ca/ -- does not

Thank you for having me along on this journey. I don't really know where it's leading, but maybe it's about the weird software behaviors we discover on the way.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 14 points 19 hours ago

There are weaknesses and attack vectors, but they are in my opinion more secure than almost all realistic alternatives. If you think you've come up with a better system, by all means, implement it. I commend your skepticism of following the herd and may it serve you well. But beware of pursuing security through obscurity. People recommend password managers because they are one of the best solutions available for navigating this complex threat environment we live in and they are appropriate for most people's situations.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 16 points 20 hours ago

That should just be a general capitalism reminder.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Absolutely true. They'll buy the data they want from some shitty crawler running from some data broker in some far-flung and lawless part of the world, hallucinate the actual source, and pretend they had no idea their "data partner" wasn't respecting robots.txt if they have to, which they won't ever have to do because it's literally impossible to detect and prove and realistically unenforceable.

This is a company that removed it's company motto of "Don't be evil" because it found it too "limiting". Don't be naive.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 days ago

"Well this shit sandwich sure is unpleasant, but at least it's fresh"

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

A submarine that can also operate in hovercraft mode? GENIUS!

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I can't say it's not, but it does link to the actual paper, which cites a lot of other research and none of it seems to be hallucinations.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago (16 children)

Elevator music is a surprisingly profitable commercial niche. For that matter, there are always going to be soulless, insipid, overused imitations of real art that gets turned into staggering commercial success precisely because it's bland and meaningless. "Live, love, laugh" for example.

Not everything has to have meaning and significance, but we also have the right to judge it when it should.

The problem with AI is that a lot of artists literally rely at least to some extent on the money that flows from that soulless commercial drivel, either with their eyes fully open to the situation, or by convincing themselves that it does have meaning to somebody, or just themselves if nobody else. They need to pay the bills and put food on the table and a huge source of that comes from commercial art work which has a high bar for visual impact and a very low bar for ideas or meaning.

If AI replaces the meaningless filler content of the art world, how do artists survive if that's their bread and butter? It's never going to directly replace real human art, but if it removes their meal ticket, the outcome will still be the same. Soon there will be almost no real human artists left, as they'll start to become prohibitively expensive, which will drive more people to AI in a self-reinforcing feedback loop until only a handful of "masters" and a bunch of literal starving artists trying to become them without ever earning a penny. The economics of the situation are pretty dire and it's increasingly hard to picture a future for human art that doesn't look bleak.

I'm planning to do my part to make sure exclusively human-made art is always the choice I'm going to make and pay for, but there are bigger forces at play here than you or me and I don't think they're going to push things in a happy direction. The enshittification of art will happen, is already happening, and we're just along for the ride.

 

I'm just curious if anyone knows of an effort to build a federated version of something like Thingiverse, Printables, Thangs, etc. I'm not really a fan of the centralized control, commercial tie-ins and profit motivations of those and similar sites, but the community of collaboration and remixing designs means they are basically indispensable for time efficient 3d printing, they're basically like the Github of 3d printing.

For me the ideal would be to have a federated alternative where users can host and share their own creations and collections, as well as rate and comment each other's designs to help improve discoverability of the best models in the community. This seems like something that would be a good fit for the ActivityPub protocol but I'm not sure if there is something like this already out there. All I could find is this old reddit post that seems to have gotten a lot of support (and good suggestions for features) in the comments but has gone nowhere as far as I can tell.

 

I don't like the weight or fragility of huge tempered glass side panels which seems to be the default for any case that is over $100... plexiglass/acrylic and some RGB are acceptable although honestly the aesthetics are pretty much irrelevant and I don't need them. I don't want a "cheap" case either. I've cut enough fingers on poorly finished steel rattle-trap boxes and I really can't stand them.

Enough about what I don't want though. What I DO want is a case that's focused on practical features, good airflow, quiet, well-made, easy to build in, roomy without being absurdly enormous, not too unconventionally laid out so that wires will reach while allowing good cable management -- basically, something that was designed thoughtfully.

My current case is a Corsair 900D and other than the fact that it's way bigger than I'd like, I'm generally pretty happy with it, but I'm not sure what else is out there that would even be comparable, Corsair seems to have gone to tempered glass in all their larger cases and I'm not very familiar with all the other manufacturers out there nowadays.

view more: next ›