ddplf
WHAT? No, I'm not wrong, it's the language that is wrong.
This is an example of social darwinism. That doesn't mean I don't agree with this idea, it's just that I don't agree that it is viable to expect it from everyone.
Companies must be forced to care about peoples' security and privacy. Actively fighting against bots infestation would be a part of that.
Which is the worst of two worlds, because now most people will still not be able to verify other account's credibility, however people with bad intentions - who are usually more prepared - will still be able to continue their activities.
Now imagine you're a fragile person who's really paranoid about their internet activity. This is obviously a good change for them, so they click it. One day, someone decides to use this backdoor to bully that person by insulting them under multiple posts and comments that were meant not to be traceable. I can only imagine the consequences.
Everyone's facebook feed. And you can't do anything about it, can't even block shit because it just replaces the shitcontent with brainrot.
Why these years in specific?
No, I don't think I should
THANKS for the red circles, FUCKER
But I still would've figured it out WITHOUT THEM
Because I am SMART
Language.
They forgot to draw a crane and a campfire under the cage
Great, another non-political franchise going woke.
Hon hon hon, esta bien, mucho gracias, bella ciao