deathtoreddit

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 21 hours ago

Pluto? Like the user?

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmygrad.ml/post/7787041

L'chaim Marx

 

L'chaim Marx

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 1 week ago

Norman Solomon is the director of RootsAction and executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His latest book is War Made Invisible: How America Hides the Human Toll of Its Military Machine

Explains a lot

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 1 week ago

We all love these vets don't we? 💕

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

In Farsi, its "death to America"

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Speaking of news, you went to hexbear news megathread?

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Marg bar Amrikkka

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Then put it in one.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago

That reminds me

If China or more especially DPRK didn't do that certain atrocity, they would then say something along the lines of "but their country is so wacky and insane that the story would've made sense anyway"

Insert Masses Elites and Rebels quote

Westerners want to believe that other places are worse off, exactly how Americans and Canadians perennially flatter themselves by attacking each others’ decaying health-care systems, or how a divorcee might fantasize that their ex-lover’s blooming love-life is secretly miserable. This kind of “crab mentality” is actually a sophisticated coping mechanism suitable for an environment in which no other course of action seems viable. Cognitive dissonance, the kind that eventually spurs one into becoming intolerant of the status quo and into action, is initially unpleasant and scary for everybody. In this way, we can begin to understand the benefit that “victims” of propaganda derive from carelessly “spreading awareness.” Their efforts feed an ambient propaganda haze of controversy and scandal and wariness that suffocates any painful optimism (or jealousy) and ensuing sense of duty one might otherwise feel from a casual glance at the amazing things happening elsewhere. People aren’t “falling” for atrocity propaganda; they’re eagerly seeking it out, like a soothing balm.

[–] deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Isn't that the country the Americans bombed the most?

 

Let me be honest and say that this is due to @borschtisgarbo@lemmygrad.ml getting banned for a badly worded anti-Zionist post. I was hoping you'd may be publicly talk over it and reconcile

Original post that got him bannedWhy should I give a shit about anti-Semitism?

The state that exists in your name committed a genocide, of course you're gonna be hated. Most Jews still support Israel, even if there is a vocal pro-Palestinian minority. Don't expect people to not make wide ranging generalisations. Jewish people are by no means oppressed, they have been fully integrated into "whiteness". They are the oppressors, not the oppressed. It's like if your primary concern was whether or not Germans would get pogrom'ed after they did the Holocaust. Completely nonsensical. This constant victim mentality drives me fucking nuts, man. You're not gonna be genocided, so stop acting like it.


Note: welp I think I came off the wrong way with this post, well I'll get out of your hair

Outside of the specific user who was banned I wanted to address meta communities.

The previous attempts at a meta community or even a ban appeal pinned post have caused more drama in each new post as new discussions of the mod actions occur…

Often times restarting contentious discussion where folks are talking past each other and assuming bad faith.

We are available on matrix for people who wish to discuss their ban but ultimately it is very easy to make a hexbear account and as a result very easy to get banned.

This core aspect of site administration has been here since the start and if it wasn’t for the handful of spammers I deny each day I would remove the application entirely.

I’m open to a hexbear user discussion on a meta community but a local user in good standing must apply to be a moderator if a meta community is to be made.

We have been using !feedback@hexbear.net and !hexbear@hexbear.net as meta communities in addition to the Matrix space mentioned in the site sidebar for the past year or so.

 

By u/China_Appreciator on r/trueanon

Think about it. In the Islam, Mohammad (PBUH) didn't invent an entirely new theology, he merely filled in the gaps of what was already spoken before to become the final messenger of God. Likewise, Deng didn't create that much theory compared to his predecessors, but he is nevertheless the last great theoretician. I read on the Governance of China, Xi isn't really creating new theories, he's just guiding China towards the completion of the primary stage of socialism as Deng envisioned. Socialism with Chinese Characteristics is the last major development of Marxist thought.

Karl Marx is like Moses in that he creates this radically new way of understanding the world that all these other guys would later draw from. Marx and Moses are also both Jewish.

(Note - I'd rather replace Moses with Abraham)

Mao Zedong is like Jesus Christ in that they are both venerated by billions of people and draw from the previous guy. Jesus is like "It's cool that Jews have this super awesome God, but wouldn't it be cooler if he could be EVERYONE's God?" and Mao is like "These are cool theories, but wouldn't it be cooler if we actually APPLIED these theories?" Their publications are both some of the most printed books of all time. Their teachings fill their followers with great joy and a hope for a better future. Disrespecting Jesus and Mao deeply offends many people and is considered sacrilegious in a sense.

Where does Deng come in? Well in the Islamic tradition, Jesus isn't the son of God, but is still the messiah and the savior of humanity. Likewise, Deng maintains that Mao saved China, but he wasn't perfect and he made mistakes. He adopts Marxism and Mao Zedong thought to the material conditions of China and introduces market reforms to develop the productive forces with the long term goal of transitioning towards a classless, stateless society. The idea of allowing capitalism as a mode of production to happen on a large scale but to subordinate it to the party is a new theoretical development, thus making him the last prophet of Marxism. If we were to apply the Mao-Deng relationship to Jesus and Mohammad (PBUH), we can better understand Islam as Christianity with Bedouin characteristics.

Here's another similarity: both did not want to be worshiped. Mohammad made it explicitly clear that worshiping or praying to him is a grave sin, there is only one God, he is merely the messenger. Deng understood the utility of the reverence for Chairman Mao as inspired fidelity to the party among the masses, but he also understood that this reverence lead to problems as seen in the cultural revolution and didn't want to create a "cult of personality" for himself. He rarely appeared in public compared to Mao and explicitly stated he didn't want his face posted up everywhere. Isn't that interesting when you consider that it's forbidden in Islam to depict Mohammad (PBUH)?

We can also understand the schism in the Western left between Socialism with Chinese Characteristic upholders like myself, PLAkilledmyGrandma and DearOccupant (my favorite posters in this sub) and "Maoists" that say Deng was illegitimate. In this analogy the Maoists are like Christians who reject the messages of Mohammad (PBUH) and declare him a false prophet. They say the Maoist (Christian) way was correct and that the later contributions by Deng/Mohammad are a false deviation of what is the "true" theory/theology.

What about Deng's successors? Well those are the caliphates. Jiang Zemin was the first caliphate, Hu Jintao/Wen Jiabo were the second and third, and Xi Jinping is the fourth (Ali). If you read their theoretical publications it's not really anything new, it's basically just their standard operating procedure about how they plan to implement socialism with Chinese Characteristics during their respective times of administration that corresponded to China's stage in development. And the caliphates Abu Bakr, Omar, Uthman, and Ali created much of the legal foundations for Shariah during their reign, but ultimately Shariah is just Islam as codified into law. It's not a fundamentally new thing. Mohammad laid out the blueprint they're just implementing it.

 

We have refed'd together. (Later then with rest of lemmyverse) Here's a post from me

china under the bed china-rent-free hexbear-specter

14
"You reached the VIP lounge" (packaged-media.redd.it)
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by deathtoreddit@lemmygrad.ml to c/genzedong@lemmygrad.ml
view more: next ›