Ok
korendian
joined 2 months ago
I have been wondering about setting up wii controllers on my batocera box I built. I have no clue how to go about it, but I do know that there is an aiming setting for games like duck hunt. Not sure how easy it would be to set up overall, vs just using the actually wii I have directly.
I have seen people scammed from preloaded boxes. I recommend just DIYing it, it's not too difficult to do.
Just built a batocera box from a PC I found on the trash. Only had to buy a wifi/Bluetooth card for $40 and now I can play every system up to PS3.
It's not an actual instance, but it was reserved by someone who made a lovely site. No, it's not what you think.
The mods are tankies, and most leftists are not left enough for them.
Yea, and those people are wrong and dumb. To completely disqualify a game for simply using placeholder AI art work is idiotic. You're welcome to disagree as well, but I'm gonna call a spade a spade.
No, I'm pointing out the hypocrisy and nonsensical nature of such rules. GenAI is not allowed for giving an "unfair" advantage, but engines with a lot of tools and automations don't? It's just an arbitrary line.
You just highlighted perfectly how the rules are idiotic. Why are we treating game development like it's some kind of competitive sport? Why should we restrict the tools people use to develop their games? Should we only say that people can use a particular game engine, because certain other game engines have a lot of tools and automation that make the development process easier? It's a really a ridiculous way of thinking.
I never said they didn't break the rules, but that doesn't mean that the rules are idiotic.
I would again point to utilizing pre-existing assets as placeholders. Do you think that that is an ok thing to do, and if so, why is that ok, but using an AI generated placeholder is not?
I don't think it is conflating any issues. I am aware that the rules said no use of AI. The issue is that such a rule is silly, because it is based on the idea that somehow using AI is inherently bad. I didn't bring up the issue of whether AI is plagiarizing, you did, or someone else did, I haven't been keeping track, but it was a response to the claim that using AI is plagiarism, which it patently is not. All of these "separate" issues were simply things I was responding to by commenters.
Your claim that using AI will inherently result in a less authentic product is something I disagree with. Again, especially in the way it was used here. Would you assert that using existing art work as an inspiration for your art work results in an inherently less authentic product? How about using a pre-made asset as a placeholder to get the development process rolling? That is my point, it was not like they tried to pass of an AI generated piece of artwork as their own, they just used it as inspiration to start the process. I don't see why this is any different from any of the other methods I mentioned.
view more: next ›
All credibility aside, it's a terrible name for a site.