[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 5 points 6 hours ago

I'll punch that fish trying to get out of the water. That will teach him.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 6 points 7 hours ago

You have 20 seconds to comply.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 70 points 14 hours ago

I'll give you a bonus one: "But where are you originally from?"

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 15 hours ago

Papyrus font? like the title from that movie?

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 19 points 21 hours ago

This dude wants out of Morrowind?

Dear readers, for better understanding please read the word "economy" as the phrase "mega yacht money"

Are you kidding me? How did NYT reach those conclusions when the chair flipping conclusions of said study quite clearly states that [sic]"The use of an LLM did not significantly enhance diagnostic reasoning performance compared with the availability of only conventional resources."

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen/fullarticle/2825395

I mean, c'mon!

On the Nature one:

"we constructed a new forward-looking (Fig. 2) benchmark, BrainBench."

and

"Instead, our analyses suggested that LLMs discovered the fundamental patterns that underlie neuroscience studies, which enabled LLMs to predict the outcomes of studies that were novel to them."

and

"We found that LLMs outperform human experts on BrainBench"

Is in reality saying: we made this benchmark that LLMs know how to cheat around our benchmark better than experts do, nothing more, nothing else.

Poor lad that lives and works in a server room's console.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 11 points 1 day ago

"We just need to drain a couple of lakes more and I promise bro you'll see the papers."

I work in the field and I've seen tons of programs dedicated to use AI on healthcare and except for data analytics (data science) or computer image, everything ends in a nothing-burger with cheese that someone can put on their website and call the press.

LLMs are not good for decision making (and unless there is a real paradigm shift) they won't ever be due to their statistical nature.

The biggest pitfall we have right now is that LLMs are super expensive to train and maintain as a service and companies are pushing them hard promising future features that, by most of the research community they won't ever reach (as they have plateaued): Will we run out of data? Limits of LLM scaling based on human-generated data Large Language Models: a Survey (2024) No "Zero-Shot" Without Exponential Data: Pretraining Concept Frequency Determines Multimodal Model Performance

And for those that don't want to read papers on a weekend, there was a nice episode of computerphile 'ere: https://youtu.be/dDUC-LqVrPU

</end of rant>

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 87 points 1 day ago

Epic is in stage 1 of enshittification. They will offer a great deal (at their economic expense) to capture users and providers.

[-] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 14 points 1 day ago

I am now confused, not sure if because I can't recognize the well or I am too thirsty.

58

In my case I'll say either Bloodhound Gang's The Bad touch or Aqua's Barbie Girl.

I mean.. what the hell is "hanky panky".

But for bonus points, I did also sing "take a walk on the wild side~" with no flying clue what "giving head" was supposed to be.

view more: next ›

massive_bereavement

joined 5 months ago