and those who can polate from complete data.
It probably has not happened yet because it could have a big impact on EU inflation. Are EU citizens ready to pay the price or will they vote more for far right populists for every additional euro on the energy bill? I think the citizens not directly facing the danger of Russian invasion are still not motivated enough to push the politicians to act.
See the 2022 energy crisis due to post COVID demand and the Russian invasion.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_energy_crisis_(2021%E2%80%932023)
Definitely not. Making food and eating are among my top pleasures, I'm always motivated to do that. So I rather have to be careful to limit my intake when I'm feeling down.
If there's one thing Japan loves, it is economical competition. There are like 40 different ways to pay at a shop, it's absurd.
According to their official 30 project website, there are still a lot of 50, but it does look like less than 51%. It's also possible the report is based on older numbers as it takes time to collect from many different organizations. https://bolognacitta30.it/mappe/mappa-delle-velocita/
Obviously not great if it's punitive, but if it introduces new creative gameplay or story branching, it could be cool.
48
Paris, Amsterdam and Antwerp on the podium of the safest European cities for kids' circulation
(cleancitiescampaign.org)
cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/19454496
5
Paris, Amsterdam and Antwerp on the podium of the safest European cities for kids' circulation
(cleancitiescampaign.org)
cross-posted from: https://jlai.lu/post/19454496
43
Paris, Amsterdam and Antwerp on the podium of the safest European cities for kids' circulation
(cleancitiescampaign.org)
Your way is assuming they will question the things with your push statements. What I’m saying is they believe they have solid foundation, and their alternative facts account for most pushes. They’ll bring up reasons. They’ll say “facts”(obviously not real ones, but they have them). They’ll feel they’re knowledge. Those things cause them to effectively counter soft pushes, in my opinion.
My work hypothesis is that most people are actually not that solid, they think they are until you push them to explain, and then they get softer as you raise points they didn't consider before.
And for 1000000 times the cost of normal extraction probably.
You said this:
Arguing without the understanding that they have alternatives facts is wrong
I'm asking you why would you think that is not already integrated in my way, since I think it is implied by what I explained.
Honestly, it makes me wonder if you’ve actually interacted with these sorts.
Not the MAGA people since I don't live in the USA, but French conservatives, mostly through the diversity of background that exists in sports activities.
The best approach that I’ve found is to beat them to the punch of saying things. Basically, make points before they can say stipid shit, they’re very easily manipulated if they haven’t already taken a stance in the conversation
I think this could work, but it limits the number of opportunities quite a lot. I see no reason to not try both.
Gum arabic (gum acacia, gum sudani, Senegal gum and by other names[a]) (Arabic: صمغ عربي) is a tree gum exuded by two species of Acacia sensu lato, Senegalia senegal[2] and Vachellia seyal. The gum is harvested commercially from wild trees, mostly in Sudan (about 70% of the global supply) and throughout the Sahel, from Senegal to Somalia.
Gum arabic is a complex mixture of glycoproteins and polysaccharides, predominantly polymers of arabinose and galactose. It is soluble in water, edible, and used primarily in the food industry and soft drink industry as a stabilizer, with E number E414 (I414 in the US). Gum arabic is a key ingredient in traditional lithography and is used in printing, paints, glues, cosmetics, and various industrial applications, including viscosity control in inks and in textile industries, though less expensive materials compete with it for many of these roles.
Gum arabic exuding from Acacia nilotica. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) • CC BY-SA 4.0
Why would you think it's without knowing they got intoxicated by fake news?
That's the point, you think they have wrong ideas, so you push them gently to increase the chance that they will question them by themselves.
If that's a poor way to do it, maybe you have a better way, what is it?
view more: next ›
Assuming he's just a middle manager, just express your polite disagreement everytime it makes sense by writing in a way that will cover your butt when shit eventually hits the fan and higher ups step in. If he's the head of the company, maybe you should spend teaching time with him to avoid losing your job when the company fails.