52

It was the only way to watch anime with romanian subtitles, as there are no legal services that offer romanian subtitles, not even crunchyroll. The community was also very good, with people dedicated to translating, subbing, encoding and uploading

Their domain anime.kage.ro now redirects to the private tracker animetorrents.ro now. Most (but not all) of the series have been migrated there. A sad day to see the only active fansubbing community from here go away :(

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 20 points 1 month ago

Being on the metro the phone ~~could~~ will easily fall when accelerating and braking

45
submitted 2 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

So until now I always had closed ports because my ISP put me behind a CGNAT and can't open ports (No I don't need a vpn because no one cares in my country) Over time I just accepted that I cannot open ports but recently saw that if I tell them they will take me out of the CGNAT and be connectable, now I'm waiting for that.

Do you know what speed can you have before and after you open ports and more importantly what percent of peers have their ports open?

29
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/linux@lemmy.ml

So recently tried zorin os and now im dual booting it with windows, and because of that I need a have NTFS partition between them. Now I have a 256gb windows partition, a 256 linux partition and a 1.7 Tb shared ntfs partition shared between them and I wonder how do you organize your files if you need to have them on another partition and cant use ~.

For programs they will always end up on / and I cant install them on another partition (dont know why) but what do you do for files? What folders do you have and where are they?

54
submitted 3 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/piracy@lemmy.dbzer0.com

So title, joining premium or even java servers with geysermc from cracked bedrock will work, but why? If you can't join with cracled java why can you with cracked bedrock?

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 42 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Soo fucked up, and not alone. In 2006 they interrogated a man that they suspected for murder of his girlfriend while he was visibly SHOT IN THE HEAD, and denied him medical care even tho he has a victim. He died 10y later from brain damage. Ryan Waller.

156
submitted 6 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
58
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/newcommunities@lemmy.world

It currently is on fmhy.ml who is down(!soulseek_slsk@lemmy.fmhy.ml), are there here any users of that comunity? Should we make a new one?

4
submitted 6 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/romania@feddit.ro

Parcă în general românii acceptă mai mult înjuratul în engleză decât în română, e parțial corect și că unii oameni nu înțeleg, însă sunt mult mai mulți care înțeleg deci de ce oare

42
submitted 7 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/technology@lemmy.world

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/10816479

So I was thinking about what if we could make a network that the only thing you needed to connect to it is to directly connect ( through wires or directed wireless antennas ) to at least 1 computer that takes part in it, with no centralized node of any kind. For that we would need a whole new protocol and address system. THIS IS JUST A THING IN MY MIND TO TALK ABOUT. I AM NOT ADVANCED IN THIS DOMAIN.

At first I thought at making groups of 256 nodes so that every node inside of that group knows every other node. A node will know nodes's group address that until now are just 2 hexadecimal digits like "D8" and the location address. A location address means what path to take to connect to any node, a location address for 98 would be "connect to 63, ask 63 to redirect message to A9, ask A9 to redirect message to CF, ask CF to redirect message to 98". Messages between a groups nodes would be all encrypted and all steps of the location address would be encrypted for each node in part.

Now every node in a group can send encrypted messages to anyone else in that group.

Now lets say that another node wants to connect to that network, but the group is already 256 nodes: That node will create another group. The first node of a group picks a random 2 digit hexadecimal address for that group. A node knows at least 1 computer's location address from every group. Untill now addresses are like "D8.01" D8 is a computer's address in a group and 01 is that group's address. 256 groups will create a kilogroup, each node knows at least 1 computer's location address from every kilogroup. Untill now addresses are like "D8.01.8F" , 8F being the kilogroup's address.

This thing can scale ever more, creating megagroups, gigagroups etc...

If I wanna connect to D8.01.8F then I first connect to a node that I know is in the 8F kilogroup, that node will connect to a node it knows in the 01 group, and that node knows D8 directly so it will connect to him and give him message, this kinda works like a DHT, wich me sending the message to the closer node I know to the destination node

Now this is very very far from perfect or usable, what happens if 2 networks grow independent and when they connect they have the same addresses? What if someone wants to sabotage this with a fake node? The location is also not very private.

Can this get better or even usable? Do you have any ideas or just want to discuss this?

31
submitted 7 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/technology@beehaw.org

So I was thinking about what if we could make a network that the only thing you needed to connect to it is to directly connect ( through wires or directed wireless antennas ) to at least 1 computer that takes part in it, with no centralized node of any kind. For that we would need a whole new protocol and address system. THIS IS JUST A THING IN MY MIND TO TALK ABOUT. I AM NOT ADVANCED IN THIS DOMAIN.

At first I thought at making groups of 256 nodes so that every node inside of that group knows every other node. A node will know nodes's group address that until now are just 2 hexadecimal digits like "D8" and the location address. A location address means what path to take to connect to any node, a location address for 98 would be "connect to 63, ask 63 to redirect message to A9, ask A9 to redirect message to CF, ask CF to redirect message to 98". Messages between a groups nodes would be all encrypted and all steps of the location address would be encrypted for each node in part.

Now every node in a group can send encrypted messages to anyone else in that group.

Now lets say that another node wants to connect to that network, but the group is already 256 nodes: That node will create another group. The first node of a group picks a random 2 digit hexadecimal address for that group. A node knows at least 1 computer's location address from every group. Untill now addresses are like "D8.01" D8 is a computer's address in a group and 01 is that group's address. 256 groups will create a kilogroup, each node knows at least 1 computer's location address from every kilogroup. Untill now addresses are like "D8.01.8F" , 8F being the kilogroup's address.

This thing can scale ever more, creating megagroups, gigagroups etc...

If I wanna connect to D8.01.8F then I first connect to a node that I know is in the 8F kilogroup, that node will connect to a node it knows in the 01 group, and that node knows D8 directly so it will connect to him and give him message, this kinda works like a DHT, wich me sending the message to the closer node I know to the destination node

Now this is very very far from perfect or usable, what happens if 2 networks grow independent and when they connect they have the same addresses? What if someone wants to sabotage this with a fake node? The location is also not very private.

Can this get better or even usable? Do you have any ideas or just want to discuss this?

5
submitted 7 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/techsupport@lemmy.world
3
submitted 7 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/romania@feddit.ro

Sunt multe locuri opulente pe lumea asta, de ce tocmai Dubai?

22
submitted 7 months ago by sarmale@lemmy.zip to c/technology@beehaw.org

A 4 min 1080p30fps video taken with my phone camera is 518MB, While a 12 min 1080p30fps video ripped from youtube is 341MB, both are using mp4 h.264 as codec and the youtube one isnt of lower quality, so why this big difference?

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)
[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Every brother has one of these on their site, and somehow that browser always wins

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 27 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

So many accidents in Romania could be avoided if freight trucks were on rail, but now freight rail is garbage and nobody says anything

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 22 points 9 months ago

If you close the circuit breaker can it still shock from capacitors?

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 16 points 9 months ago

5 is binding...click!

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 34 points 10 months ago

"Yeah what if they kill themselves? Their fault"

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 21 points 11 months ago

The implementation google pushes for is, also couldnt find any foss rcs apps

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 18 points 11 months ago

Can you write any unicode cahracter? Gotta make passwords in cuneiform

[-] sarmale@lemmy.zip 25 points 1 year ago

If compatibility wasnt an issue then 70 procent of the industry would already switch to Blender

view more: next ›

sarmale

joined 1 year ago