I've tried multiple times over the years and had the same experience. As far as I can tell Wikipedia is dominated by a weird clique of power tripping dicks. If you're not in the clique they will revert anything you do, even fixing really blatant and obvious typos or misspellings will get reverted.
ultranaut
joined 2 years ago
Losing weight and not drinking alcohol.
I wouldn't be surprised if it stops performing as well going forward but the selection criteria is always going to result in an ETF that isn't likely to be shitty. If you're looking for more diversity outside the US, I've been buying some EUAD this year. Other than a bit of gold its the only new thing I've added to my portfolio in reaction to Trumpism. Its working out so far but of course things can change, do your own research and due diligence, etc.
I remember losing track of time watching it on TV and my boss called all pissed off. Rush to work and he is giving us shit because everyone was late. A coworker guilt tripped him hard about how we all just watched thousands of people die and were traumatized. He shut up and eventually sent us home early.
Increasing, but I think still unlikely. I think the most likely scenario for that to happen is he loses his primary but stays in as an independent.
Don't be a dick.
What is drug culture like? I've read alcohol use and abuse are very common but have no idea about anything else. Do you guys have weed? Cocaine? MDMA? Opioids?
Potentially yes, if you use existing IP to make music, doing it with a computer isn't going to change anything about how the law works. It does get super complicated and there's ambiguity depending on the specifics, but mostly if you do it a not obvious way and no one knows how you did it you're going to be fine, anything other than that you will potentially get sued, even if whatever you did was a legally permissible use of the IP. Rightsholders generally hate when anyone who isn't them tries to make money off their IP regardless of how they try to do it or whether they have a right to do it unless they paid for a license.
That feels categorically different unless AI has legal standing as a person. We're talking about training LLMs, there's not anything more than people using computers going on here.
Where does the training data come from seems like the main issue, rather than the training itself. Copying has to take place somewhere for that data to exist. I'm no fan of the current IP regime but it seems like an obvious problem if you get caught making money with terabytes of content you don't have a license for.
Shit, I missed that.
262
Gun Companies Gave Customers’ Sensitive Personal Information to Political Operatives
(www.propublica.org)
view more: next ›
I didn't keep track of them, but I've only ever tried to fix blatant mistakes like typos and misspellings. The most recent was several years ago, I think 2020 or 2021. If you want to see it happen find a typo and try to fix it.