I recently watched Guyon Espiner's interview with China's ambassador to New Zealand, Dr. Wang Xiaolong, and in the interview Wang Xiaolong didn't have anything good to say about America's role as the global policeman. In fact he went as far as calling them "the great interferer" and accused the United States of using "colour revolutions". A term which, in New Zealand, is usually considered a Russian propaganda term.

Given the tremendous combined economic power of the BRICS nations I think that New Zealand should consider having equal relationships with countries, instead of taking sides as if we were still in the last century. There is absolutely no reason to sign onto crap like the AUKUS pillar two, which may involve getting involved in drone and missile production.

On Reddit a while ago, people thought AUKUS was a great idea. In the newspaper, they whine that we are only getting pillar two. We won't even be getting nuclear subs, or deploying our navy in the next big war. How sad lol

If AUKUS involves New Zealand working with the U.S. on drone and missile technology, is that something we want? I know the political class are mentally ill, but are we, the citizens, comfortable if our people and our engineers are going to work on technology that's going to kill Chinese soldiers in the South China Sea?

I'd love to see this from Winston Peters' view or Judith Collins' view, but I can't shove my head that far up my arse. Already there will be redditors coping hard on this topic by saying we can just put sanctions on China in a few years, and shift all our trade to India. I think that's extremely naive. Just re-shape the whole economy, so that we can afford to piss off China, and keep supporting U.S. supremacy? What does our country get from constantly pleasing the US?

The BRICS nations are growing their influence and promoting multi-polarity and ideas like non-alignment, but for some reason the media, the parliament, and all the "security experts" in New Zealand say that NZ must be aligned with the United States.

I don't support sanctions because I don't think that trade should revolve around politics. I believe we should have equal trade relations with all countries and not get involved with messy bloc politics. I laugh at Trump's threat to put economic sanctions on countries that stop trading in the US dollar. If say, 6 or 12 countries start using a cryptocurrency to trade, but without ever using the USD in the transaction, will Winston Peters come out and condemn this? lol

There is no reason to further align ourselves with a declining global power that keeps pushing its rivals together. We are in Five Eyes and that should be the limit. New Zealand should trade with whoever offers the best deals, and we should have no involvement in military alliances or any form of politically influenced trade.

The United States can only sit and watch as Russian soldiers advance toward Pokrovsk. Within 30 years China will reunify Taiwan by force, and there's nothing that the United States can do, because they don't have the power any more, the world has moved on.

The NZ parliament needs to die off and be replaced with younger people because these old nutters like Winston Peters don't get it. For example, they talk about blocking butter exports to Russia, because "raising the cost" will apparently influence something. What cost? What influence? The Soviet people lost 10 million people when they fought Germany. I'm sure they could lose 0.5% of that in the current conflict, and pay more for butter, and it still won't influence any political or military decisions.

I wish Winston Peters and the others would understand this but they're just too damn old. Nobody should tell us who we can or can't trade with. Trade does not equal political support. Just because the U.S. has declining relations with China, it doesn't mean we should stop trading with China. The propaganda in the news is already emerging, that China is a threat and we should move to other markets. There's really nothing wrong with having good relations with other countries in the region, but I guess the yanks want us to always side with them and orientate New Zealand's economy around US political interests. Weak as.

Sooner or later we had better figure out what the 21st century is going to look like, and adapt accordingly.

Dame Tariana Turia, a former member of parliament and government minister, has died. She was 80.

The former Labour Party MP and founder and former co-leader of Te Pāti Māori was a champion of Māori aspirations.

She served in Parliament for 18 years, initially as a list MP and then in the Te Tai Hauāuru seat for over a decade.

Dame Tariana suffered a stroke over the New Year period. Her iwi said at the time she did not have much time left.

The coalition is tweaking university regulations to curb what it says is an increasingly "risk-averse approach" to free speech.

The proposed changes will set clear expectations on how universities should approach freedom of speech issues.

Each university will then have to adopt a "freedom of speech statement" consistent with the central government's expectations. The changes will also prohibit tertiary institutions from adopting positions on issues that do not relate to their core functions.

"Despite being required by the Education Act and the Bill of Rights Act to uphold academic freedom and freedom of expression, there is a growing trend of universities deplatforming speakers and cancelling events where they might be perceived as controversial or offensive.

Govt closing foodbanks as unemployment hits 4 year high with no end in sight.

Just joining a few dots.

The Workplace Relations Minister Brooke van Velden has announced plans to reintroduce pay deductions for partial strikes.

A partial strike is where the employee is still doing some form of their work. Employers have been banned from reducing the worker's pay since the previous Labour-led government removed that power in 2018.

ACT's van Velden said she recognised the entitlement of employees to strike, but the disruption caused "should not continue without consequence".

More than half the government's key targets are behind track or at risk of not being met, the latest progress update shows.

You'll have to click through to see the graphics that show the targets.

An investigative journalist who was barred from attending the national apology to survivors of abuse in care has now been granted accreditation.

Parliament's speaker has now granted temporary Press Gallery accreditation to journalist Aaron Smale for Tuesday's apology for abuse in care. He must, however, be accompanied by a Newsroom reporter at all times.

Last week, speaker Gerry Brownlee declined an application from Newsroom for Smale to report on the apology.

Parliament's Press Gallery gallery had asked for an explanation, as a refusal was quite rare, especially when a reporter met the gallery's criteria for accreditation.

It was told the application was declined, with the speaker citing Smale's conduct on a prior occasion.

On Monday afternoon, the press gallery wrote to the speaker, requesting a more fulsome explanation.

In an about-turn, the speaker approved the application.

At a media conference at Parliament in July, Smale and the Prime Minister had an exchange over the government's law and order policies, and whether the Prime Minister would acknowledge the link between abuse and gang membership.

According to Newsroom, Smale had also attended a media event at a youth justice facility in Palmerston North, and pressed children's minister Karen Chhour over whether it had been appropriate to associate the memory of the Māori Battalion with the new youth justice programme.

"The Beehive was in touch with us to say they believed he had been too forceful and too rude, in their view, in those two occasions," Newsroom's co-editor Tim Murphy told Nine to Noon.

Murphy said that Smale had conceded he had pushed the children's minister a bit far.

"But the one in Parliament, he was asking specific questions and kept asking them of the Prime Minister and I think that became irritating to the Prime Minister," Murphy said.

Describing Smale as "the most informed, possibly, probably of all New Zealand journalists" on the issue of abuse in state care institutions, Murphy said political discomfort should not be a reason to exclude Smale, and the ban should not stand.

"As a society that values the role of the fourth estate, we should value the work of journalists like Aaron, because it helps us take a critical look at where we have gone wrong and how we may move forward," said the Greens' media and communications spokesperson Hūhana Lyndon.

"Barring a leading journalist from an important event like this speaks to this Government's lack of accountability. It is something we might expect in Putin's Russia, not 21st century Aotearoa New Zealand."

Am I the only one that gets lizard person vibes from the quotes from Luxon in that article?

Well, they did it after all. Do you think she will finally resign, or will she go kicking and screaming?

For a party that ran its campaign on devolving decision making to the regions, this is massive overreach.

I know first hand the infrastructure problems facing Wellington but the council literally only just had the vote. They need to be given the opportunity to find solutions, and go back to the public for consultation, rather than being blackmailed by the minister. Very much comes across as “do as I say, or else” given their hard on for asset sales.

Submissions on tolling the replacement gorge road have now closed, but Woodville residents are refusing to give up fighting.

Under the current proposal, those driving between Palmerston North and Woodville in a light vehicle could pay $4.30 per trip, $8.60 for a return - and up to $17.20 for heavy vehicles.

The former State Highway 3 through the Manawatū Gorge closed in 2017 due to rockfall.

Companies and shareholders associated with 12 fast-track projects gave more than $500,000 in political donations to National, Act and New Zealand First and their candidates, RNZ analysis shows.

The projects include a quarry extension into conservation land and a development whose owner was publicly supported by National MPs during a legal battle with Kāinga Ora.

University of Otago legal expert Professor Andrew Geddis said the Cabinet Manual doesn't cover whether receiving a donation is a conflict of interest.

In a political system where a lot of the money used for campaigning comes from private sources, it would be difficult to bar parties from being involved in decisions which impact donors.

"The unions give lots of money to the Labour Party. If that was then to mean that the Labour Party couldn't pass workplace relations legislation that impacts on unions, it would take a huge policy issue just out of play."

If this was the rule, donors wouldn't donate, he said.

Key: "Donald Trump is driving very much an America First and a more isolationist kind of view. Actually, it's quite different, it's a very different foreign policy than we've ever seen. So that probably doesn't help New Zealanders much. But on balance, I think he's probably better for the economy.“

Please participate. Don't let the country be handed over to the oligarchs.

The police powerpoint presentation, released to Stuff under the Official Information Act, said members of sovereign citizens group Mauri Nation used fake ID to reach the Prime Minister's floor at Parliament.

The presentation from the Police Security Intelligence and Threats Group in November last year, does not say whether the Prime Minister - then Jacinda Ardern - was present.

Everything is going as planned with this government "starve the beast" strategy. They want to destroy the healthcare system so that people will accept privatisation as a possible cure.

The nation as usual is utterly ignorant of what's going on.

Write up from my old mate Max Rashbrooke on the success of the school lunch program, and the likely impacts of the cuts to the program from the National-Act-NZ First government.

Budget documents show the government was told of "profound" wellbeing benefits from the free school lunch scheme months before it decided to trim its funding.

The research was supposed to be published in June but was still under wraps.

However, Budget papers published this week referred to the study's early findings.

"Emerging findings support previous evaluation findings, but also highlight further benefits of the programme, including improvements in achievement and the importance of universality," said a December briefing note to Minister of Education Erica Stanford.

"This includes that learners are more settled and able to engage with classroom activity and learning, with some schools showing increased academic achievement resulting from an enhanced learning experience from being more settled and less distracted. Initial findings also indicate that the programme is having a profound impact on the wellbeing of learners," it said.

Earlier this year, the government cut annual funding for the scheme by $107 million, reducing the per-student spend for children at intermediate and secondary schools to $3.

A March briefing paper about changing the model for Ka Ora, Ka Ako said it was not clear whether lunches could be provided at that price.

"The most significant risk from the proposal is that we have not market-tested or otherwise analysed the proposed $3 per head price. We do not know whether sufficient supply exists to offer lunches to the specified standard at this price across the full range of schools," the document said.

Unfortunately that's behind a paywall, but there's ways and means of reading it, eg via RSS subscription to NZ Herald.

A couple of notes for the benefit of those that can't read it. Two lecturers in maths education have pointed out that Luxon's claim that there is a crisis is misleading as the achievement data is "based on a new draft curriculum, with a higher benchmark compared to previous years."

ie, the standard for achievement is higher, not the level of maths knowledge declining suddenly. In fact "We’ve been tracking student achievement in mathematics at Year 8 for more than 10 years, and in that time, there has been no evidence for improvement or decline."

More alarmingly for me, a ministerial advisory group was setup which has recommended a new curriculum even while acknowledging there is a lack of evidence for teaching maths the way it proscribes.

That advisory group is chaired by an NZ Initiative idealogue, Dr Michael Johnston and the article almost infers he is basically pushing his own manifesto on how education should be conducted into the curriculum - again, despite evidence it has application to maths education.

For anyone that doesn't know, the NZ Initiative was formed by merging the Business Roundtable and the NZ Institute. They are far right neoliberal idealogues and you'll see people cycle through the organisation before going into political reporting or lobbying, or in Nicola Willis case being placed into political party roles.

"More people are going to have to rely on cars and trucks to get around because we don't have a pipeline of alternatives like rapid transit, inter-city passenger rail, public transport and safe walking and cycling in our communities”

I make no secret of how much I disagree with the Governments policy choices but this takes the award for making me apoplectic.

Fuck the most vulnerable members of society! They don’t contribute anything. Landlords need their dignity back and house flippers should get more profit.

Fucking scum.

I'm sure it was just a poorly thought out choice of words, but the Tsunami remark is kinda hilarious.

Good on the postal union to tell them where to stick their pamphlet, I say.

Of course, David Seymour is upset about it.