this post was submitted on 02 Dec 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

Star Trek

2381 readers
2 users here now

/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!

Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!

~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.

~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!

~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The station and single nacelle ship are all kinds of silly. Glad they didn't pull too much from that frame.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The single nacelle is seriously unsettling, and I'm not sure why

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it’s kind of neat.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Mat Damon. His face aging.

Right there with ya, buddy.

[–] 14th_cylon@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because you got used to seeing the double nacelle ones.

if it were the other way around (they would have established the single nacelle as standard), you would end up thinking the other way around.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I'm thinking it's the dong-like look.

[–] Beacon@fedia.io 6 points 1 year ago

I think it's cause our brains interpret that as an unbalanced shape that would fall over.

[–] lemmylommy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

It’s the unibrow of ship design.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Shh, you're going to make Hermes and Saladin feel bad.

All classes are beautiful.

[–] Asetru@feddit.org 6 points 1 year ago

And Kelvin?

The top one was just the hangar.

[–] Iheartcheese@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I'm shaming those ships.

[–] Bishma@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

I like that the Enterprise shuttle has a metal detector sticking out the back, to show the scale for the props dept to build it to be about the size of a golf cart.

I'd buy this commemorative stamp set from the post office.

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

LOL for a second I thought the shuttlecraft had a trailer hitch.

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Tribble truck-nuts.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Pity the poor engineers squashed into a space the size of a studio apartment on that one nacelle ship.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 1 year ago

Comments are nitpicking the two pictures, but no one says anything about the Klingon ship, because Klingon ships are always badass.

But on the subject of the single nacelle, I always liked the original concepts for the fleet, from the scouts and tugs to the dreadnaughts. There was something authentic about taking the same components and reusing them in different configurations for different purposes. Why would you reinvent something when you have a proven design, at least for the first generation of ships.