LOL I was replying to you literally saying the hacking demo at Defcon, where they had the physical machines right there in the room, was "not terribly useful unless you have unfettered access to the machines." I'm saying that wouldn't have mattered in November because they were networked.
LovableSidekick
Being the CEO of a company and not having a working webcam seems like a dead straight no-brainer giveaway that this is a scam. I mean, you know... a CEO who can't do video Zoom meetings? Come on.
So he's flying to LA to be taken who knows where alone in a car with her driver? Dude NO, absolutely NOT. Please talk your dad out of this, srsly.
But srsly I wonder why they weren't included in the survey, it's kinda weird.
Sounds like a GAME-CHANGER!
Isn't that just what AI would say tho?
It's more of an attitude than a theory. We do have metrics that say bot activity now represents about 60% of internet traffic, recently surpassing human activity. That's a majority, but the whole internet processes around 150 million requests per second, so 60 million of that is humans. Per second. Objectively I wouldn't call that "dead" by any means.
The machines in November had network access.
NOT releasing it is undermining voter confidence.
Not really, but I do remember those things used to keep a room warm.
I can see my house from here!
When I worked at WotC around 2010 my boss told me back in the 90s GWAR wanted to be their house band, and used to show up at the company regularly to make pitches.
What I miss a lot more than the hardware was the straightforwardness of coding. In those days we largely just translated process logic into code, we didn't have to cobble together frameworks, packages, libraries and containers. The code itself took more work but we could do it without knowing as much as devs have to know now.