Rhaedas

joined 2 years ago
[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 22 minutes ago

We haven't changed. Companies will not spend more than they have to on IT if they think they can deal with it until next quarter. This was no different, plus developers of software didn't expect their stuff to become legacy and not updated with better programs. Memory was premium, so a few less bytes here and there that would work fine for a few years was what they did.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 31 minutes ago

And the idea of a safety net has been around for a long time, in various forms, yet somehow helping everyone has always been a bad thing to do.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 5 points 34 minutes ago

The actors I liked a lot, they all did great at capturing the nuances. The plots.... meh. They also didn't have the same realistic "feel" of the classic TV/movies. It was more "arcadish" and shiny. I will say there are a few scenes/lines in some of them that I liked, even though it was a different timeline. "Your father was captain of a starship for 12 minutes. He saved 800 lives, including your mother's. And yours. I dare you to do better." I still prefer the original Kirk origin, and the Kirk in the various novels over the years is a bad ass prodigy.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 3 points 40 minutes ago

Forgot Éomer - "Now is the hour! Riders of Rohan! Oaths you have taken, now fulfill them all, to lord and land!"

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Is that something accessible through a spacewalk, or was it designed by modern car engineers who don't care about maintenance after the sale?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 60 points 1 day ago (2 children)

France should ask for it back.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 9 points 2 days ago

Now that's a scratching "post".

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 1 points 2 days ago

I don't know, it's 30 years in the past. Maybe something as simple as lazy handoff of info to the next shift, the staff not noticing how long she'd been there or her lack of progress.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'll take the blame, I shortened the statements maybe a bit too much, assuming the references would work. But they were explained well by the other replies.

I was learning in the 90s from lessons on AOL how to sanitize inputs and salt passwords along with HTML 1.0. It baffles me how corporations let stupid things happen now.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 15 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Lemmy and related places are still small enough where a regular name posting can become better known faster than large platforms. My only advice is to just review your posts before first submitting to make sure its message is clear, and if people ask questions about it, then clarify. If you want to engage and discuss things, this is part of it. You're getting discussion. :)

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 60 points 3 days ago

Well timed. Got to the end text, had a half second of "wait..."

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 3 days ago (3 children)

The poor mother. Hopefully it wasn't lengthy and just a quick reaction to being stuck. My wife failed at her first and only after 36 hours of labor did they decide to go in. Probably should have followed up with what bad decisions led to that, but we were young kids and didn't know better then.

 

I have an older robot vacuum that has finally shown some age in its battery. The charger will charge for about 15 mins and then gets an error, but it's enough to do a decent vacuuming of the room if I charge then vacuum, then repeat once more. I can't leave it on the charger now due to the error repeating, so basically I run it dead until the next time.

So my question is, can I continue doing this since it works well enough, or is there potential problems/danger with the battery being at less capacity? I could buy a new battery, they aren't terrible in price, but if it works and is safe, why not continue what I'm doing until it completely gives out?

view more: next ›