this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2026
120 points (93.5% liked)

politics

30319 readers
2617 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Fifield, 41, is the second woman to allege this week that Platner engaged in nonconsensual sexual conduct. Jenny Racicot, 41, who said she previously dated Platner, told The Post and other outlets on Monday that he sexually assaulted her in late 2021, leading a growing number of allies to drop their endorsements and call on him to withdraw from the race for a Maine seat in the U.S. Senate. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vermont), his most influential and prominent supporter, said he spoke with Platner on Tuesday and urged him to withdraw from his campaign to unseat Susan Collins, the incumbent Republican.

Platner, 41, a Marine Corps veteran and oyster farmer, also denied Racicot’s allegation but said on Monday that he was “mindful of the political reality” that the reporting will “inflict” on his campaign and was “taking the time to reflect on the best path forward.”

Fifield initially told The Post about the alleged condom removal during a June 20 interview that was off the record. She said she decided to speak publicly about it Tuesday in part because, she said, she wanted to show that Racicot was not alone in experiencing issues with Platner involving sexual consent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

So are we saying our preferred outcome is for Susan Collins to retain her seat? I have a hard time landing on that as the morally correct choice no matter what is on the other side of the table. I think what does the most good for the most people in this situation is for her to be out of office.

[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 33 minutes ago

We don't need more rapists in office. It shouldn't be that hard to find a candidate that doesn't rape people.

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (1 children)

Platner should drop out and they should coalesce around Troy Jackson if he wants to run. Appeal to the base that wanted Platner in the first place and focus on forcing that old corpse Collins out no matter what.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Who is Troy Jackson? I am not from New England so I don't know much about any state politics there.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

If platner had a long track record of community organizing and working towards the things he has claimed on his platform? I would still not be able to say "Let's support the rapist nazi" but I would at least understand the logic.

He has no political or leadership track record. He said a few things you want to hear and that is it.

What he DOES have a track record of is lying. Whether it be blatant lies about a "military history buff" reddit user having no idea what Mitchell and Webb's totenkopf is or, ya know, all the rape?

So we have a wildcard candidate where the only thing we know about him is that he is a rapist nazi. MAYBE it is worth getting someone else on that ticket?

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

I don't give two shits about Platner. I care about unseating Susan Collins. Platner seems to have the best chance at accomplishing that, as far as I can tell.

Stopping, or at least slowing down, Trump is the ultimate goal. We know Susan Collins won't do that. All her replacement needs to do is vote with Trump less than 90% of the time for it to be a significant win.

If there's a way to get there without Platner I'm all ears, but all I hear right now is talk of letting Republicans keep the seat and that seems like the worst case scenario to me.

[–] SailorFuzz@lemmy.world 3 points 10 hours ago

Platner seems to ~~have~~ the best chance at accomplishing that

HAD the best chance.

Regardless of if the allegations are true or not, Platner has no shot at this point. This will deflate any momentum he had. It is going to disillusion too many that he will not have the enthusastic support needed to beat Collins. His campaign is just too toxic at this point, people arent going to show.

So either we huff copium, and deny that reality until he gets defeated later OR we pivot now while we still have any shot.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Voting against people is what’s given conservatives disguised as centrists power all around the world. Stop being so proudly stupid and actually demand real change. It can be done, but carrying on like you are only adds barriers to progress.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's impressive how stupid this comment was, given that most of it was you loudly professing to be smarter than everyone else.

[–] Soup@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -1 points 14 hours ago

And how does electing more nazis and more rapists help with slowing down trump?

If there’s a way to get there without Platner I’m all ears,

Well... the first step is to do what we should have done back during the primaries and get the nazi mercenary off the ticket and put someone else up there. From what I've seen, Troy Jackson seems like a great candidate. Very similar platform, good Union boy, and has a strong track record of actually trying to follow through on his campaign promises at the state level.