SailorFuzz

Too many people think that the law=morality

moderately informed people know who Peter Thiel is.... EVERYONE knows who Elon Musk is.

People who are "smart TV bad" need to start telling me where tf they're getting their dumb tvs at. Because I've tried looking. Monitors vs TVs are "dumb" devices, but they don't make 65inch monitor that isn't also a car loan....

Sadly he died during covid.

If the US wanted to have a French style revolution, it would have to start with the symbol of excess, Elon Musk.

The Steam "Community"

Here's where you're wrong

Their litmus test for "people they think will agree with them" is just: be a white man.

I am a burly white dude. Tall, big beard, I look like I walked out of the mountains.... Unprompted, some white people will casually say some unhinged rascist shit to me. And have, many times.

One time there was a shooting nearby, a white maintenence worker told me about it, and then without missing a beat goes "it was two black guys shooting at eachother, so much for brotherly love, right?"

Another time, in a gas station up in the sticks, Im buying a can of monster. Some white stranger, unprompted, taps me on the shoulder starts telling me about how the logo is a Jewish letters for the sign of the devil.....

So, no, you dont have to be someone these people know.... you just have to a white man. They assume any white man (especially masculine presenting) is one of them.

ootl, what did he say? I just remember him from so many classic movies.

Minecraft streamers already ruined Minecraft

I’m not saying this individual chose to personally kill these people. But was he involved?

So... by your own admission, you can't "objectively" say he did those things.... you're speculating and assuming.

You originally claimed it as though it was an objective fact that he, personally, was a murderer.... and now you've edited and moved the goal posts to "took part in" and then you moved it back further with "involved". What's next? "Associated with"? "Served with"?

None of this is "objective", by definition. A definition in which you keep changing. So, we're done, you're wrong and I'm not arguing with a bad faith zealot who keeps weaseling their words to justify their illogical contempt.

please, there are two options here, neither is good for Schumer. Either, he's ineffectual party leader (whether by not knowing or not having control).... OR he orchestrated it to maintain "plausible" deniability.