185
Hate Nato, Hates IKEA and Hates freedom..
(lemmy.ca)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
185 points (96.5% liked)
NonCredibleDefense
6426 readers
473 users here now
A community for your defence shitposting needs
Rules
1. Be nice
Do not make personal attacks against each other, call for violence against anyone, or intentionally antagonize people in the comment sections.
2. Explain incorrect defense articles and takes
If you want to post a non-credible take, it must be from a "credible" source (news article, politician, or military leader) and must have a comment laying out exactly why it's non-credible. Random twitter and YouTube comments belong in the Low Hanging Fruit thread.
3. Content must be relevant
Posts must be about military hardware or international security/defense. This is not the page to fawn over Youtube personalities, simp over political leaders, or discuss other areas of international policy.
4. No racism / hatespeech
No slurs. No advocating for the killing of people or insulting them based on physical, religious, or ideological traits.
5. No politics
We don't care if you're Republican, Democrat, Socialist, Stalinist, Baathist, or some other hot mess. Leave it at the door. This applies to comments as well.
6. No seriousposting
We don't want your uncut war footage, fundraisers, credible news articles, or other such things. The world is already serious enough as it is.
7. No classified material
Classified information is off limits regardless of how "open source" and "easy to find" it is.
8. Source artwork
If you use somebody's art in your post or as your post, the OP must provide a direct link to the art's source in the comment section, or a good reason why this was not possible (such as the artist deleting their account). The source should be a place that the artist themselves uploaded the art. A booru is not a source. A watermark is not a source.
9. No low-effort posts
No egregiously low effort posts. These include Social media screenshots with a title punchline / no punchline, recent (after the start of the Ukraine War) reposts, simple reaction & template memes, and images with the punchline in the title. Put these in weekly Low effort thread instead.
10. Don't get us banned
No brigading or harassing other communities. Do not post memes with a "haha people that I hate died… haha" punchline or violating the sh.itjust.works rules (below). This includes content illegal in Canada.
Join our Matrix chatroom
Other communities you may be interested in
- !militaryporn@lemmy.world
- !forgottenweapons@lemmy.world
- !combatvideos@sh.itjust.works
- !militarymoe@ani.social
Banner made by u/Fertility18
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
So they're angry that other people have it better than them and the solution is to make life terrible for all those people rather than demand something good of your own government?
I don't think Russian's a human. How on Earth do they think like that, if other people have it better than you, clearly the problem is with your country. Who comes to the conclusion that the problem is the other country.
Anyway imagine lusting after ikea furniture. Someone should tell them that we think it's all crap. That will really drive them.
While this person's mindset here is reprehensible; try to avoid making sweeping generalizations based off a few encounters. It's destructive and can be quite hurtful.
I didn't make sweeping generalizations I'm making a comment based on what is visible in the text. I'm sure not all Russians are like this but I'm not talking about all Russians where did you get the impression that I was?
Using russian as a prular and "they" instead of "this guy" or something, probably gave that idea.
I must have misunderstood then, my bad!
This is clearly a typo of some kind and I interpreted it to the sentence "I don't think Russians are human". With the use of plural pronouns after this point, my misinterpretation caused the entire point of your comment to be warped which is how I came to the "sweeping generalizations" conclusion.
Not a typo, they're referring to the individual Russian in the post: " [that] Russian [is] a human"
Ah ok, I can see that. I read it the other way too
Just say vatnik. It just means anyone who gobbles the Russian gov propaganda cock. Fuck this vatnik