1
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by jocose@kbin.social to c/washington@kbin.social

Plug in or gas up, it doesn’t matter. The more you drive the more you pay.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ramble81@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

That makes sense to some degree, given that the taxes were meant for maintenance of roads. However the per mile tax should also be a sliding value based on vehicle weight as that increases damage to the road. So a light car going a few miles wouldn't be taxed as heavily as a truck going a long distance since it wouldn't damage the roads the same way. Though at the point you've thrown out any incentive for more fuel efficient ICE powerplants.

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago

farmers and others also may drive quite a lot in vehicles on their own properties without ever touching a road. If it's purely for roads and not, say, including a carbon tax or something, that seems rather unfair.

[-] ramble81@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Existing gas taxes also affect them in this way then. They pay for the gas tax used and they're not driving on public roads, so that seems to be a wash.

[-] jocose@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We actually have off-road diesel for this. Alberta also used to have "purple gas" but it was halted in 1999 due to rampant abuse. We could do something like that, but it hasn't worked historically.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

The State of Washington — The Evergreen State

5 readers
2 users here now

Washington State in the Pacific Northest

founded 2 years ago