976
No. (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sxan@midwest.social 27 points 4 months ago

I'm surprised. Merriam-Webster is usually the Urban Dictionary of print dictionaries. I'd have more expected them to change their definition because "muh common usage."

Hacks. OED or death.

[-] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 35 points 4 months ago

I love that there are strong opinions like this out there for dictionaries.

You've convinced me. I'm ride or die for OED now too.

[-] Stubb 6 points 4 months ago

I once read an article praising the 1913 edition of the Webster's dictionary and I have been using it ever since (in the form of GNU Collaborative International Dictionary of English). That with etymonline makes the reading experience quite pleasant.

[-] sxan@midwest.social 4 points 4 months ago

Webster's still had morals in 1913. I wouldn't shun a 1913 edition.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
976 points (97.4% liked)

People Twitter

5283 readers
2521 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS