Source
X = 100 → zero nutritious? Why inverted?
Hope this helps:)
(The chart legend seems not to be placed properly, maybe that's why they mirrored the chart.)
Oi, I noticed the vertical axis is logarithmic, the impact difference is bigger than I thought.
Thanks :)
Be respectful
X = 100 → zero nutritious?
Why inverted?
Hope this helps:)
(The chart legend seems not to be placed properly, maybe that's why they mirrored the chart.)
Oi, I noticed the vertical axis is logarithmic, the impact difference is bigger than I thought.
Thanks :)