1775
submitted 1 year ago by narwhal@lemmy.ml to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] moonmeow@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

ya, using the internet without an adblocker is a security risk because Google enables scams across its services.

How about they learn to clean house first before shitting on the internet lol.

incompetent company will do incompetent things.

[-] ThaNook@lemmy.zip 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think the FBI recommends the use of ad blockers for personal safety, let me find that link real quick...

Edit: FOUND IT, Third point under "Tips to Protect Yourself"

[-] CallumWells@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Let's just go back to the good old days when the web worked without JS. That would remove a massive amount of attack surface. Might seem a bit shit without the interactivity, though.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Is there any way to make JS safer? E.g. limiting the scope of its access to specific functions (e.g. visual/DOM changes, posting/querying a server only but no local function), or is it just inherently unsafe?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
1775 points (99.2% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
100 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS