this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
13 points (88.2% liked)
Severance
558 readers
4 users here now
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
No one? Seems like it would fall under self defense. It was self defense and self preservation that made innie hold the gun on him, and the trigger was pulled on accident. If I were a lawyer I could probably find a relevant case.
The Tribunal demands a conviction. The Napoleonic code seems silly from their perspective.
Why would a cosmically fair tribunal demand someone be found guilty? That doesn't seem fair at all if nobody was guilty. What code of ethics are they abiding by then?
The demand for a guilty party comes from the same cosmic bung hole that the Lutherans pulled their theological stance on innie-souls from!