this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2025
47 points (100.0% liked)

Economics

2002 readers
3 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 6 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

nowhere nearly “easy”

nuclear strikes on a carrier fleet are an easy way to sink them. No civilian casualties. War doesn't have to be a fuck around process.

You have The Chinese telling all of their neighbors in the S.C. sea that they own it, trying push the Philippines back, trying to push the Vietnamese back.

There's room for compromise on a greater cooperation agreement, especially with Vietnam. Philippines deserve destruction or overthrow of their corrupt US puppet.

[–] 52fighters -2 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Only a feeble-minded person could believe that anyone could confidently use nuclear weapons against the United States and not face equal retaliation. The people would demand it.

[–] Eiren@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And every major population in the U.S. would be annihilated in return. If China decided to nuke their own coast, America would either do nothing about it or come to a swift and total end.

[–] 52fighters -1 points 2 weeks ago

Which is why your projection about nuclear weapons is just stupid. It ain't happening.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)