this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
195 points (86.0% liked)

Privacy

38162 readers
428 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I remember a time when visiting a website that opens a javacript dialog box asking for your name so the message "hi " could be displayed was baulked at.

Why does signal want a phone number to register? Is there a better alternative?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world -4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

The phone carrier at least here in the US is required to store the call data for 18 months, according to the one that I use.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

What does that have to do with Signal?

[–] solrize@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

The claim is that Signal's phone verification step doesn't cause privacy problems because Signal (purportedly) doesn't retain the phone numbers after verification. That claim is falsified because the phone carrier stores the call record even if Signal doesn't. They store it because of the same law that makes them turn it over to Big Brother on demand. The phone verification step is, therefore, a privacy problem. Obviously there are similar issues with IP routing, but at least I can use a VPN with an endpoint in another country.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No, that wasn't the claim. Phone numbers are used for sign up, but the post's OP was talking about messaging meta data. Messaging meta data doesn't go through your carrier and is encrypted.

If you check the publication of signal's cases where they had to hand out data, and in reverse the FBI leak that listed analysis of all messenger apps by what data they were able to acquire in most cases, Signal came out as one of the top options.

[–] solrize@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Oh I see what you mean. But a big enough data dump from the phone carriers identifies all of Signal's users, not good.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)