this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
89 points (84.5% liked)

Technology

70081 readers
3091 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I found the article to be rather confusing.

One thing to point out is that the video codec used in this research (but for which results weren't published for some reason), H264, is not at all state of the art.

H265 is far newer and they are already working on H266. There are also other much higher quality codecs such as AV1. For what it's worth, they do reference H265, but I don't have access to the source research paper, so it's difficult to say what they are comparing against.

The performance relative to FLAC is interesting though.

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I wonder what the practical reasons for starting with h.264 are.

[–] entropicdrift 2 points 2 days ago

Low/no patent issues, much simpler complexity

load more comments (1 replies)