this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
-12 points (28.6% liked)

Conservatives

114 readers
49 users here now

Pro-conservative discussions

Rules

  1. Pro-conservative or crazy liberal post.
  2. We are a discussion forum. No low effort, trolling comments.
  3. Everyone is welcome to opine, but be civil.
  4. Attack the topic, not the person
  5. Report violations of the rules
  6. Downvotes are disabled

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com -2 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I wasn't wrong. I explained to you what the law allows.

[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 3 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I wasn’t wrong

You said they didn't prevent him from leaving when they did prevent him from leaving. You were wrong.

[–] Chucklestheclown@hilariouschaos.com -1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

No I am not. What was the outcome? Did he leave or was he arrested? You seem to think he’s still sitting there and the police are still beating him

[–] rah@hilariouschaos.com 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

You seem to think he’s still sitting there and the police are still beating him

What makes you think that?

After I pointed that he was pulled to the ground when he tried to get up and walk away, you said:

Now they should have given him a chance to walk away again but that isn't a requirement.

So clearly you're agreeing that they wouldn't let him leave. Then you changed your tune and said:

They didn’t prevent him from leaving.

But a police officer clearly pulls him back down on to the ground after he gets up to leave. That officer prevented him from leaving. Your statement "they didn't prevent him from leaving" was false. A police officer preventing the man from leaving is an event that occurred. It's shown in the video. I don't understand why you can't accept that what you said was wrong. You're acting like a child.

load more comments (1 replies)