this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2025
639 points (96.9% liked)

Malicious Compliance

21330 readers
205 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 3 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Nah, I'm not going to argue science and statistics with someone who clearly understands neither.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Going through these comments you've not presented one scientific or statistical argument. You're basically going on vibes.

[–] entwine413@lemm.ee 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I've only responded to you twice. Once to tell you that a biased sample set provides garbage data, and again to tell you I wouldn't be arguing with someone who didn't understand the core concepts of the conversation.

The vibes thing is quite the projection, though.

[–] njm1314@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Considering this is the first time you've responded to me at all I think maybe I don't trust your ability to judge Core Concepts of a conversation.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)