Technology

261 readers

1321 users here now

Share interesting Technology news and links.

Rules:

No paywalled sites at all.
News articles has to be recent, not older than 2 weeks (14 days).
No videos.
Post only direct links.

To encourage more original sources and keep this space commercial free as much as I could, the following websites are Blacklisted:

Al Jazeera.
NBC.
CNBC.
Substack.
Tom's Hardware.
ZDNet.
TechSpot.
Ars Technica.
Vox Media outlets, with exception for Axios(Due to being ad free.)
Engadget.
TechCrunch.
Gizmodo.
Futurism.
PCWorld.
ComputerWorld.
Mashable.

More sites will be added to the blacklist as needed.

Encouraged:

Archive links in the body of the post.
Linking to the direct source, instead of linking to an article talking about the source.

founded 2 months ago

MODERATORS

Pro@programming.dev

Solid-state batteries charge in a fraction of the time, run cooler, and pack more energy into less space than traditional lithium-ion versions. (news.ucr.edu)

submitted 5 days ago by Pro@programming.dev to c/Technology@programming.dev

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is such a non-piece that it shouldn't have even been posted. Probably written by AI too.

[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I can't say it's not, but it does link to the actual paper, which cites a lot of other research and none of it seems to be hallucinations.

[–] CrayonDevourer@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The paper itself is proper - I'm still reading over it. But the 'article' linked to seems to be an AI summary with no actual substance to be found. It repeats itself a lot with rewordings of the same generic solid state batteries are better than "liquid batteries" because they're solid and not liquid.

I just doesn't pass the sniff test.