640
submitted 10 months ago by buh@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] TiffyBelle@feddit.uk 97 points 10 months ago

All well and good, but sadly this relies on the hosts managing DNS to include specific entries in their DNS configuration for keys to use during the encryption process. Unfortunately the vast majority of hosts probably won't be bothered to do this, similar to DNSSEC.

[-] LastYearsPumpkin@feddit.ch 136 points 10 months ago

And HTTPS relies on hosts managing SSL certificates. Web services don't use them until it hits a critical mass, then it becomes weird and broken when you aren't using it.

This just needs some time to settle in.

[-] DarkThoughts@kbin.social 76 points 10 months ago

I remember when absolutely no one used https and then in a matter of a couple years things got really fast. Now you can easily browse with https required and only occasionally find the odd website that doesn't use it (mostly some internet relic). That was such a great transition when it happened though.

[-] Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

Google preferring https sites was the motivator I saw for client demands.

SEO scores feed into the PPC cost in AdWords so all of a sudden people were crying out for their sites to “have the padlock icon” because what’s 20 bucks for a cert when you’re spending thousands of dollars a month

[-] jazir5@lemmy.ml 11 points 10 months ago

And now it's free with stuff like Let's Encrypt.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (23 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2023
640 points (98.9% liked)

Firefox

17302 readers
46 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS