71
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
71 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
43 readers
1 users here now
@politics on kbin.social is a magazine to share and discuss current events news, opinion/analysis, videos, or other informative content related to politicians, politics, or policy-making at all levels of governance (federal, state, local), both domestic and international. Members of all political perspectives are welcome here, though we run a tight ship. Community guidelines and submission rules were co-created between the Mod Team and early members of @politics. Please read all community guidelines and submission rules carefully before engaging our magazine.
founded 2 years ago
At least part is worker shortages. Any unemployment less than 5% is generally considered full employment. We are at 3.7% even with concerns of the economy possibly going into a recession, so more jobs than works to fill them. Couple of reasons unemployment is so low.
Employment pool can be expanded, or workers can be more efficient to do more with less time. Certain states want to expand the employment pool and the easiest way is to make it so kids can work more. I can think of no real reasons this is a good thing and is actually a net positive. "allow(a) young adults to devleop their skills in the workforce." is not one of them, and is more likely code to try to get new workers to be like old workers pre-pandemic.
the reality is, the jobs they're wanting to get kids into aren't well paying, and most, you can't support yourself, never mind a family on. rather than increasing pay... which they could absolutely do... they've decided that employing their bought-and-paid-for congress people to roll back protections so they can exploit kids (who won't know they're being underpaid, presumably.)
Pretty much