this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
1512 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

70048 readers
3920 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago (5 children)

Or this is essentially a hostile takeover by Microsoft. OpenAI is a non-profit with non-shareholders as it's board. They don't have a profit motive to develop AI quickly and without safety measures. But the tech they've developed has quickly become the hottest product on the planet.

Microsoft was clearly prepared to take on all the employees the second this happened.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 11 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Microsoft is huge. They're always prepared to take on a few hundred new employees.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (3 children)

These will come at a premium. Not only are they high-demand jobs, but they'll absolutely be sued by OpenAI if they hire away half the staff of a company with which they had a business relationship. Those legal fees alone will be 8 figures even if they win.

[–] b3nsn0w@pricefield.org 4 points 2 years ago

they spent 10 figures on openai already. 8 figures for the whole openai team is pennies

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)