76
submitted 1 year ago by scroll_responsibly to c/sdfpubnix
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] wesker 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I guess I don't understand why we would be lenient with a corporation that has actively destroyed the modern internet for profits, blatantly violates user privacy, etc etc.

The topic of defederation seems to really make people want to break out their soap boxes to talk about open access and free love, despite you know... the real world being real, and corpos willing to shit on your good thing for a few bucks.

[-] zumi 9 points 1 year ago

Allowing an org to federate is not being lenient, it is how federation works. Defederating should be done to protect the federation from a node causing harm to the federation--not preemptively in my opinion.

[-] wesker 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So let a known criminal into your home, until they commit a crime? Wouldn't not letting the known criminal into your home be the safer, more protective route?

[-] gortbrown 8 points 1 year ago

I think a house isn't the best comparison here, as a house isn't a public space, whereas the Fediverse is. A better comparison might be a town square or a park. Anyone is welcome to be there, but if they do something bad, or it becomes obvious that they are going to do something bad, then they can be removed from that space. Otherwise they should be allowed to exist in that space.

[-] johnpeters42 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The counterargument to that (I'm not taking a stance on it, but I get why others would) is "it's already obvious, look at their past history and what they've already done just within the past few days".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2023
76 points (91.3% liked)

sdfpubnix

1331 readers
2 users here now

Fans of SDF

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
SDF