2 authors say OpenAI 'ingested' their books to train ChatGPT. Now they're suing, and a 'wave' of similar court cases may follow. (www.businessinsider.com)

submitted 1 year ago by Spzi@lemm.ee to c/chatgpt@lemmy.world

22 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/1246165

Two authors sued OpenAI, accusing the company of violating copyright law. They say OpenAI used their work to train ChatGPT without their consent.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] _Rho_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

How can they prove this though? I don't think they'd have any way to. Unless OpenAI straight up admits it. But like the article mentions, the data could still have been obtained legally.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Ask ChatGPT to summarize Sarah Silverman’s book. Ask it to give you a few quotes from it.

How else would it be able to do that unless it had been trained using the book as an input.

[-] _Rho_@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hmm. That's a fair point. Lol.

I suppose it's possible that it was trained on articles and such that quote/summarize the book. But what you're saying makes sense.

[-] Moskus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

ChatGPT could have read 1000 other summaries of the book, it doesn't have to read the actual book to make a summary. It can just rewrite don't out the old ones.

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023

82 points (95.6% liked)

ChatGPT

8977 readers

1 users here now

Unofficial ChatGPT community to discuss anything ChatGPT

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

marcar@lemmy.world