31
OK doomer (www.newyorker.com)

The New Yorker has a piece on the Bay Area AI doomer and e/acc scenes.

Excerpts:

[Katja] Grace used to work for Eliezer Yudkowsky, a bearded guy with a fedora, a petulant demeanor, and a p(doom) of ninety-nine per cent. Raised in Chicago as an Orthodox Jew, he dropped out of school after eighth grade, taught himself calculus and atheism, started blogging, and, in the early two-thousands, made his way to the Bay Area. His best-known works include “Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality,” a piece of fan fiction running to more than six hundred thousand words, and “The Sequences,” a gargantuan series of essays about how to sharpen one’s thinking.

[...]

A guest brought up Scott Alexander, one of the scene’s microcelebrities, who is often invoked mononymically. “I assume you read Scott’s post yesterday?” the guest asked [Katja] Grace, referring to an essay about “major AI safety advances,” among other things. “He was truly in top form.”

Grace looked sheepish. “Scott and I are dating,” she said—intermittently, nonexclusively—“but that doesn’t mean I always remember to read his stuff.”

[...]

“The same people cycle between selling AGI utopia and doom,” Timnit Gebru, a former Google computer scientist and now a critic of the industry, told me. “They are all endowed and funded by the tech billionaires who build all the systems we’re supposed to be worried about making us extinct.”

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 8 months ago

I dunno. At least in the US, these people are decidedly outside the mainstream, at least in the US. Their views on religion and sexual mores preclude any popular appeal, and they are handicapped in a similar way were they to try to infiltrate existing power structures.

Basically their only hope is that an AI under their control takes over the world.

[-] YouKnowWhoTheFuckIAM@awful.systems 8 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Come on, you’re talking about America, when did mainstream popular appeal ever limit anyone with money?

[-] gerikson@awful.systems 9 points 8 months ago

You still need to lever that money by "buying" the people in power.

Right now there's really no mainstream politicians 100% on board with the weirdness of TESCREALs:

  • mainstream Democrats - too wary of corporations, too eager to regulate
  • pre-Trump GOP - maybe, but they're losing influence fast
  • current Trump GOP - literally crazy, way too easy for TESCREALs to be painted as a satanic cult
[-] lobotomy42@awful.systems 5 points 8 months ago

Maybe. The current EA strategy is to takeover all the technocratic positions in government/business one level down from the ostensible policy-makers. The idea being that if they are the only ones qualified to actually write the reports on "alignment" for DoD/NIST/etc. then ultimately they get to squeeze in some final control over the language, regardless of what Joe Senator wants. Similarly, by monopolizing and brainwashing all the think tank positions, even the Joe Senators out there end up leaning on them to write the bills and executive orders.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2024
31 points (100.0% liked)

SneerClub

983 readers
8 users here now

Hurling ordure at the TREACLES, especially those closely related to LessWrong.

AI-Industrial-Complex grift is fine as long as it sufficiently relates to the AI doom from the TREACLES. (Though TechTakes may be more suitable.)

This is sneer club, not debate club. Unless it's amusing debate.

[Especially don't debate the race scientists, if any sneak in - we ban and delete them as unsuitable for the server.]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS