this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2023
14 points (76.9% liked)

Technology

39160 readers
316 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I keep thinking this would have been a much better sell to devs and to users. I have always used Sync, and Boost. I tried the official app a few times, but really only used it for the chat feature. I didn't want to pay for it, but (I am embarrassed to admit it) I would pay premium to keep my app. I think this would have worked out better for Reddit than the garbage they are pulling right now.

Would that have been a more reasonable solution in your opinion as well?

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Obstruct7794@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I never paid for it before and I wouldn't start now. Especially not after how they've been handling the whole situation.

I do agree with what you're saying, though. Many people would have been fine with paying to keep their favourite apps.

[–] Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I wouldn't have paid for, but i would have accepted much better. "API usage is ad free hence only premium users can access it" is much better than "API users are freeloaders that take more than they are giving, fuck them!"

[–] SoupOfTheDay@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

I’d be willing to pay for Apollo premium(I should have a while ago) to pay for API costs, but fuck Reddit! Seriously if Apollo/RIF came forward and said “Reddit is going to charge us for API, the price is high but reasonable” I’d have bought Apollo premium to help out, but 20mil? Nah, that’s Reddit crushing competition and fuck them.

[–] FlaxPicker@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe if the fediverse didn’t exist.

[–] Thanks4Nothing@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I am really working on making Lemmy work. It's slowly getting there for me...learning curves. I just miss the subreddits I had for my niche hobbies. It really bums me out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] millions@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

With how spez is handling this? No.

[–] Cyder@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

I personally don't think the API pricing was ever meant to be reasonable or cover their true costs. Between the absurd pricing, the short timing, their test that blocked mobile web browsers, and refusal to even negotiate, it's clear to me that they just want to kill 3rd party apps and force everyone on mobile into the official mobile app where they can enforce their monetization schemes.

[–] tiwenty@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Initially I would have for like 5€/month I guess. But now, I'll just directly use the browser with ublock when I need something. For scrolling I'll stay here

[–] melonpunk@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Reddit exists to make its investors money, that's it's only goal now. The userbase are a complication to deal with in order to appease the advertisers. It's not the platform for users any more.

[–] SheeEttin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No. They're allowing more and more spam outside of their ad platform. They're actively user-hostile. I already don't like it for free, why the hell would I want to pay for it?

[–] Badabinski@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Not at this point. I don't want to give bad faith actors my business, and Mr. Huffman has shown himself to be a big ol' penis. At the beginning? With unadulterated access (i.e. NSFW content) and gentler rules for 3rd party apps? Sure, I would have been ok with that.

[–] VegaLyrae@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

It's amazing how every time I think Huffman has destroyed every shred of credibility and goodwill he goes and digs the hole even deeper.

[–] Ataraxia@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago
[–] greg@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

I absolutely would have if things were handled differently, but at this point my only goal is to see spez get his ass fired.

[–] primaryuser@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No. Even if they decided to do something to placate us today, they've shown their hand and demonstrated they don't give a shit about their userbase. I have no plans of going back. Period.

[–] BlackEco@lemmy.blackeco.com 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I would have IF it had been the solution Reddit had came up with in the first place AND they hadn't destroyed my trust in them with their handling of the protests.

I have an issue with your proposed solution though: it does not address the use case of moderation / accessibility / utility tools and bots.

[–] Aurix@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

No, because the sudden API lockout of third party apps with yearly subscriptions shows they do not care about contractual obligations.

[–] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

10$ annually to login via api. Not a single cent more.

Now that reddit fucked it up and I've found a nice community, idk.

[–] dvdnet90@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

If Reddit want to settle this conflict peacefully. I want to do that. But, with recent news today I don't think so

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›