1415
Wait, not like that (lemmy.world)
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] bruhduh@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago
[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 6 points 5 months ago

.500S&W and .50 Browning would like a word.....

[-] Bgugi@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

12.7×41mmSR and 12.7×99mm NATO have no words.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] acetanilide@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Why is one called .500 and the other .50? I looked them up and both are basically the same diameter but I don't get the origin of the name itself (especially since the .50 is actually .510 diameter??)

[-] bluewing@lemm.ee 4 points 5 months ago

They are, in fact NOT the same diameter. Despite what the names may imply. A .500S&W has a bullet diameter of .500" to prevent classification as a destructive device by the BATF in the US.

The .50BMG, is .510" bullet diameter. It is allowed because it's been grandfathered in - it's been around for a very long time. And the few people who can afford to actually own and shoot something in that caliber aren't a whole lot of people - despite what Hollywood, and to be fair some politicians would have you think. Stuff be stupid expensive Yo.

There are no legal or industry required conventions in naming rifle cartridges. You can pretty much call it whatever you want. Even the Europeans do this. You can have a rifle in 8mm Mauser, 8x57 Mauser, or 7.92x57 Mauser. And tehy all refer to the exact same cartridge and are totally interchangeable. There was a brief time with early black powder cartridge arms were about. They would name a cartridge something like .45-70-500 Government. This would tell you the bullet was .45 caliber with a 70grain powder charge, and the bullet weighted 500grains as used by the US government. And then by the late 1800's they somehow lost the thread and went completely off the rails bringing us to today. (I blame the French. Why? No reason, I just irrationally do.) Where many of the "new" calibers are often re-treads with a new name, because marketing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 months ago

as a non gun person, how much are we betting that we use metric sizing, and the load them based on imperial standards (for the ammo manufacturers that work in the US)

[-] John_McMurray@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

(It's just a way to brand....a 5.56 bullet is a .223 bullet but a 5.56 cartridge is much "hotter" then a .223, you can fire a .223 through a 5.56 rifle but I would strongly recommend not doing 5.56 in a .223)

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] p3n@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

This is a pretty good video explaining why the imperial system in the U.S. isn't as bad as it seems: https://youtu.be/iJymKowx8cY?si=wcyG7yM150e71Rn4

[-] stoneparchment@possumpat.io 7 points 5 months ago

Just because it isn't as bad a joke would imply doesn't mean it still isn't really quite bad

Base 12 vs base 10 is pretty much the only objective advantage of USC, and it only uniquely occurs in USC for small construction-scale tasks (i.e. the inch-to-foot scale).

I don't think people critiquing USC are unaware of what this video is saying. We just think it's still worse.

source: 8th gen American who would rather switch to SI

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 5 months ago

The United States has been on the Metric system since the late 1800s like every other Western country.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago
[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 4 points 5 months ago

Every food label, with very few exceptions, lists the contents in either grams or milliliters, in addition to ounces or fluid ounces. Every thermometer I've ever seen has both Fahrenheit and Celsius scales. We buy electricity in watts with metric currency. We measure the light output in lumens, and the common lightbulb sizes are measured in millimeters, but the wires that carry the electricity are measured by AWG. The parts on my bicycle and car all use metric measurements, except for tires. Tires are an unholy abomination with section width given in millimeters, the cross-section in a unitless ratio, and the rim diameter given in inches.

Meh, what're you gonna do? We switched to, or adopted, SI and metric where it made sense, but we have a lot of legacy systems.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

let me just pop my 10 mg pills.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
1415 points (98.7% liked)

memes

9607 readers
2962 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS