839

A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices. Roku filed for the patent in August 2023 and it was published in November 2023, though it hasn't yet been granted.

The technology described would detect whether content was paused in multiple ways—if the video being displayed is static, if there's no audio being played, if a pause symbol is shown anywhere on screen, or if (on a TV with HDMI-CEC enabled) a pause signal has been received from some passthrough remote control. The system would analyze the paused image and use metadata "to identify one or more objects" in the video frame, transmit that identification information to a network, and receive and display a "relevant ad" over top of whatever the paused content is.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I would assume that these ads still need an internet connection to play. Another great reason to use an external box to play your media and leave the smart TV offline.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Etterra@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

I never considered Roku and I'm glad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] tigerjerusalem@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

That backlog of books and DVDs in my closet is more and more attractive each day.

[-] somnuz@lemm.ee 15 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There should be a special division in all patenting offices called Burning With Fire ™

[-] squid_slime@lemm.ee 14 points 8 months ago

avoid integrated smart technology, buy a separate box preferably Foss or with possibility to load a custom rom/os

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] glitchdx@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I don't have to imagine roku injecting ads, I've already seen it. Had a movie going on my tablet, screen shared to the tv over wifi, tv screen had an ad "you can watch this movie on our bullshit streaming service!". This was 2 years ago. I will never buy a smart tv. And fuck roku specifically.

[-] rasakaf679@lemmy.ml 11 points 8 months ago

Fuck Roku. If we stop buying their shit. They'll eventually be bankrupt to implement this feature. So Fuck roku

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] schwim@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

It will be interesting to see how the technology fares with something like pi-hole.

[-] Quexotic@infosec.pub 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Thanks to OP for reinforcing my choice to forever avoid smart TV's.

Edit: if you want a non-smart TV look for hospitality TVs.

Also, "how to ask everyone capable to hack your shit product without asking everyone to hack your shit product."

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 8 points 8 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Now, the company is apparently experimenting with ways to show ads over top of even more of the things you plug into your TV.

A patent application from the company spotted by Lowpass describes a system for displaying ads over any device connected over HDMI, a list that could include cable boxes, game consoles, DVD or Blu-ray players, PCs, or even other video streaming devices.

This theoretical Roku TV's internal hardware would be capable of taking the original source video feed, rendering an ad, and then combining the two into a single displayed image.

Among the business risks disclosed on Roku's financial filings from its 2023 fiscal year (PDF), the company says that its "future growth depends on the acceptance and growth of streaming TV advertising and advertising platforms."

If implemented as described, this system both gives Roku another place to put ads, and gives the company another source of user data that can be used to encourage advertisers to spend on its platforms.

It seems as though a Roku TV that was capable of this kind of ad insertion would need more sophisticated internal hardware than most current sets currently come with—this is the same company that feuded with Google a few years back because it didn't want to pay for more-expensive chips that could decode Google's AV1 video codec.


The original article contains 591 words, the summary contains 221 words. Saved 63%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] Infynis@midwest.social 7 points 8 months ago

Anyone know what I should be running Plex on instead? I don't want to just hook my computer up to the TV. Rokus are like $10, so ideally around that price point lol

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
839 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

60108 readers
2474 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS