314
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by obesity52@lemmy.world to c/lemmy@lemmy.ml

There is a big difference between mild NSFW and full on porno. Suppose there is a News story with photo/video but it's a little bit graphic or violent. Nobody is jacking off to that. Maybe shouldn't view it at work, but in the library is fine.

Maybe it's a funny meme pic but there's a nip slip situation going on. No biggy; it should probably be tagged NSFW. Probably don't want it showing up at actual work. But I want to enable this kind of content away from work without a bunch of actual porn showing up in my feed.

There should be a porn tag. It's not the same as NSFW.

EDIT: The two main devs have done some amazing work here, but as I understand it they are totally booked for the foreseeable future. My rust chops aren't quite up to snuff (yet) and my frontend chops are non-existent, so it might be a quite while before I'm up to speed enough to make a meaningful contribution. In the meantime just thought I'd point out the issue.

(page 2) 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] T156@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

NSFW category tags would be pretty handy.

I'm rather partial to how Twitter does it currently, by letting users choose a set of NSFW categories, from a generic "sensitive content" tag, a violence/gore tag, and/or a nudity/sexual content tag.

Maybe they could be implemented as part of a wider post tagging system?

[-] fleabomber@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

They are not the same.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2023
314 points (94.1% liked)

Lemmy

11948 readers
8 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS