this post was submitted on 06 Feb 2025
500 points (97.7% liked)

Technology

62073 readers
4898 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This morning I noticed that an app was silently installed on my device. Android System Safetycore.

So what is this app for? Supposedly it is designed to blur any images that are sent to or from you the user.

Android Authority Article SnippetSensitive Content Warnings is another new Google Messages feature that Google is announcing today. It’s a feature that gives you more control over seeing and sending images that may contain nudity. Sensitive Content Warning blurs images that may contain nudity before viewing them, and it then prompts you with a “speed bump” that contains “help-finding resources and options, including to view the content.” When it’s enabled and you try to send or forward an image that may contain nudity, Google Messages will also show a “speed bump” that reminds you of the risks of sending nude imagery. - Android Authority

The feature seems to be geared towards google messages.

However why this needed to be a seperate app isn't really known. Why not just a feature within the google messages app? Google gives no explanation.

Another Android Authority SnippetWarnings check runs entirely on-device, it didn’t mention that it will actually be powered by an entirely separate app and not Google Messages itself. - Android Authority

Google claims it runs entirely on your phone. Whether that's true? ¯_(ツ)_/¯

According to my device, the app can have internet access restricted to it (via phone settings) implying that the app does have internet access. Any apps that dont have internet access wouldn't be in my settings list for restricting network access.

Here's the developer page. Not much in terms of detail going on there.

Here is the app on Play store with its further lacking detail and currently plunging reviews. Interestingly it seems the app has many good odd sounding reviews. Furthermore, all the new reviews are very negative. The app was 3.8 this morning. Plunging.

The whole concept of the feature isn't a bad one. However, I certainly dont wish for it to be automatically installed on my device as a seperate app. A feature that is supposedly for a messaging platform that I don't even have activated on my device.

I removed it myself as it can be uninstalled. It doesn't show up on play store by search, however you can look up the app link online and get a direct link to it. Which I put here.

Spyware? A helpful feature? I don't want it on my phone anyways.

(Yes this is a repost, I hope it isn't considered spam. Yes I did also delete the original one :/ . Goodnight 🥱!)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 93 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hmm, don't seem to have it on my GrapheneOS phone. :)

[–] PiJiNWiNg@sh.itjust.works 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] pirat@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Checked my second GOS user profile with google services, just to make sure – nothing to be seen.

[–] Tregetour@lemdro.id 52 points 5 days ago

Say it with me, peeps. Tenant on your own land!

[–] dditty@lemm.ee 55 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I first heard about this 2 days ago and it wasn't installed on my phone at that time. Just checked again on a whim and sure enough it was installed!

Google, nobody asked for your safety center bullshit app.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 21 points 5 days ago

And what if I want to see and send nudes? Google, mind your business.

[–] knolord@lemmy.zip 35 points 5 days ago

Oh thank you! Had it on my phone without any notifications or anything else to tell me that!

Am an EU resident, so that's very worrisome to say the least.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 20 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Not sure why everybody is upset that it's a separate app. Google has been doing this with Android for almost a decade now in order to bring new functionality without needing to update the entire operating system.

[–] barryamelton@lemmy.ml 30 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

They have been moving things to apps so they can substitute piecemeal the open source OS with their close sources: https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2018/07/googles-iron-grip-on-android-controlling-open-source-by-any-means-necessary/

That article is 12 years old. It has only gotten worse.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 8 points 5 days ago

I suppose but the other side is OEMs abandoning still functional hardware

[–] TomAwsm@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I was gonna say, I feel like I've been seeing a new Android system app on a monthly basis when checking what needs updating in Google Play.

[–] MaxHardwood@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 days ago

Literally my phone just now

1000003012

[–] voodooattack@lemmy.world 22 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

So the hotdog/not hotdog algorithm is finally out?

[–] UncleGrandPa@lemmy.world 23 points 5 days ago (3 children)

so it will be able to restrict the messages you send....and cut off those it does not like?

and if in a year, no anti trump opinions are allowed.....we won't even be able to complain to our friends?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz 36 points 5 days ago

Thanks for the post. I had it on my phone as well. A couple days ago the messenger app forced me to update, I wonder if they are related.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Honestly, if the app was open-source so we can check it does not leak data, I would probably have no issue with it.

Making it a separate app makes sense if google wants to allow other apps to re-use the code. No reason to have the same functionality bundled into each app separately.

And the feature, as long as it is configurable, seems useful.

The auto-install is bad but understandable. As far as I am aware, there is no easy way to mark an app as a dependency of another app so it gets automatically installed only when needed. This should be fixed, but auto-install for all is not terrible temporary solution. This does not apply when the app is closed source and may steal your data.

[–] biggerbogboy@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If I had a nickel for every time I reported a pervy corporation to the ACCC, I’d have two nickels– which isn’t a lot, but it’s weird that it happened twice.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] FreshLight@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago

Ok, I gotta change to Graphene asap

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (3 children)

/laughs in de-googled LineageOS.

[–] octoblade@lemmynsfw.com 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Laughs in GrapheneOS and/or phone running Linux.

[–] ultimate@lemm.ee 9 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Laughs in CalyxOS. Muhahha.

[–] RubberElectrons@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

There's dozens of us.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 14 points 5 days ago

I don't understand why they'd make this a separate app and not a configurable setting in Messages.

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

There are definitely good, non malicious reasons to have it as a separate app and that should actually be preferred. Off the top of my head:

  • Separation of permissions - it only has the permissions it asks for instead of every permission messages has
  • It can be disabled/removed without disabling messages
  • it can be reused by other applications if that's a desirable feature

Some people might actually like this: thinking of women getting unsolicited dick picks in particular

[–] Wogi@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I found this in my app list, it hadn't asked for any permissions. If it's looking at every image I get, it's doing so extremely discreetly.

Sus. Very sus.

[–] qqq@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

The real issue is definitely people not having total control over their own devices.

It doesn't need permissions to be sent pictures from messages though, that's all local and likely done via an exported Service. Good chance other Google products are or will make use of it in the future.

[–] masterofn001@lemmy.ca 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Entirely on my phone?

Why did my firewall ask if I wanted to allow it internet access?

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It needs fresh dick hashes for up to date dick recognition

[–] dabaldeagul@feddit.nl 24 points 5 days ago

Recocknition, if you will

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

In other news, Google wants to scan all your messenger images.

[–] SilentKnightOwl@slrpnk.net 10 points 5 days ago

If you're using Google messages, they're definitely already doing so

[–] Gayhitler@lemmy.ml 10 points 5 days ago

Keeping sealed iodine patches and band aids inside my leather wristbands.

Staying on the edge of the pit to catch anyone who falls or takes a hit.

🧷 safetycore 🧷

[–] Carl@lemm.ee 14 points 5 days ago

tfw I've never been warned about nudes in my text messages :(

[–] Toes@ani.social 15 points 5 days ago

It's into the 2s now. Not ok to push something like this automatically. Should be opt-in.

[–] dbkblk@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago (1 children)

And then I praise microg / LineageOS

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I am using both and this somehow made it to my phone, wtaf

[–] BritishJ@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (7 children)

If you have play services installed. You will get it.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Zefirpo@feddit.it 11 points 5 days ago

Thank you! I wasn't aware of it! Un-installed now 😁

[–] Teknikal@eviltoast.org 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

Have to be honest first Android lost my support when they did their best to kill Micro SD cards then they decided to make connecting mtp only which absolutely ruined using a cable to transfer anything then came the head phone jack being removed.

The final nail on the coffin was scoped storage which made things so much slower it seemed absolutely ridiculous and also stopped you from being able to use files with the app you might have wanted.

At this point I'm kind of hoping something like Tizen or even Harmony Os takes over.

[–] MrNobody@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Why you blaming the OS for manufacturers issues. There are still phones out there with microSD and 3.5mm. Probably also some with decent transfer stuff. Funnily enough, even if another OS took over, it won't necessarily bring back all the features you want, since they are hardware based. And OS is software.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't even appear to exist for me in the UK. Yay?

[–] thisismyname@lemm.ee 8 points 5 days ago

It didn't appear in my apps list and yet if I looked at the link to the play store it said it was installed... maybe double check you don't have it by looking it up on the play store as well. Fishy to say the least

[–] DinkleDorph@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Infrastructure to give Google system wide control over what content you can and cannot view.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Benjaben@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Thanks for pointing this out, I had no idea. Removed it and left a review complaining.

load more comments
view more: next ›