this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2025
-48 points (41.8% liked)

/0 Governance

252 readers
2 users here now

A community for discussion and democratic decision making in the Divisions by zero.

Anyone with voting rights can open a governance thread and initiate a vote or a discussion. There's no special keywords you must be aware of before you open a thread, but there are some. here's the governance thread manual.

Answers

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won't be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of "use with caution" instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user's personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that's why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we'll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I'm gonna keep this short and sweet because I don't really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we'd prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn't to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn't know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it's worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve ~~harmony~~a ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I'd also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I'm setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don't know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don't want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I've covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I'll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s gonna be a no from me, fam

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] krox@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think a trial is a very reasonable thing to conduct, I support a trial run

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] plant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aatube@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

sure, see what happens, it's discourse. in the best (and naïve) scenario we can effect change by only banning many individual users who use bad-faith rhetoric

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] randomaside@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nullpotential@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Federate and let people block the instance themselves.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] anarchiddy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm clearly in the minority here, but I'm in favor of a trial refederation.

Support.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 6daemonbag@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] underscores@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'd be willing to give it a try. They can be frustrating at times, but to me it's not really worse than with liberal instances. I'd understand if the community here doesn't want to put up with them though.

I haven't checked it out in a couple years, but I remember there being several decent communities over there. But their more authoritarian communities are pretty shitty.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] No_Bark@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I say refederate. We haven't blocked any of the turbolib instances, so I think we should let users themselves decide what instance to block.

Anecdotal, but I've never had an issue with Lemmygrad or Hexbear like so many people here constantly complain about. I find both instances preferable to most of the shit that appears from places like .world

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Watching people spruke western approved tyranny and murder: Ok, diversity of opinions, marketplace of ideas

Watching people jack off about how NK is secretly really good or something: Harmful, dangerous, needs to be quarantined.

I find it so tedious. Most of the people who Pearl clutch over this come from a state that has been ruled by murderous war criminals for at least half a century.

[–] bort@hexbear.net 6 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Watching people jack off about how NK is secretly really good or something: Harmful, dangerous, needs to be quarantined.

Hear hear.

I don't know anything about NK, I've never been. I just don't think they deserve to be persecuted by the state that I know is evil because it has invaded and bombed multiple countries and killed at least hundreds of thousands of people, in my lifetime alone.

If that makes me a dangerous tankie then so be it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frozenpopsicle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Support

It will be some degree of annoying, but I am against blocking in general. I feel if instance blocking can be avoided then it should be. Give it a try.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] a_wild_mimic_appears@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

no. even if i could block them themselves, there is no excuse for the glorification of authoritarianism, regardless of which country, and i refuse to support that. I already have enough issues with the fact that lemmy.ml is pretty much undefederateable because of dessalines and nutomic residing there, and hexbear is at least funny at times.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] belastend@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

A very tacit yes? If it's in the interest of opening up discourse, I think a trial could be good. If this contributes to a healthy discourse, then it's fine by me. If we just invite them to be the auth-left aga-toad to our lib snake problem, hell no.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fantasyocean@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Boo, no tankies.

TBH though, whatever you want.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I have not been on an instance that federates with it, so personally, I don’t know what the culture is like. I’m all for building bridges with ideological cousins - modern social media is one giant machine-propelled incubator of fascist sympathy nowadays, so I really do feel strongly about having a meaningful, robust, community-driven coalition of good people with good politics. I personally believe something like BlueSky has been a big black hole vacuuming up potential fediverse users, but you could make the case as well that it puts off our eternal September for more time. Maybe it’s not the worst thing that could happen.

That said, I do hear much worse feedback about grad than I do about .ml or Hexbear. At the same time, I understand that it is one of the main instances tied to the software’s development, and that alone makes it relevant to a big instance with a tech slant like ours, IMO.

I have to abstain. I think I’d like to vote Yay, but I don’t have all the information. I don’t know enough about grad to feel capable of making a judgement.

FWIW a lot of the .ml and Hexbear bashing is ridiculous, IMO. All the complaints about a “triad” and subsequent positive interactions on these two instances have made them seem unfairly maligned to me. Maybe it’s because I live in a part of the world where politics and political violence is even more messy, and the concept of “critical support” is much more clear to me. I don’t have west-as-default baggage. So a lot of what comes off to others as apologia for states that do bad things doesn’t necessarily bother me as much as it would bother someone else. I’ve seen more frequent egregious takes on .world and ShJW. Some of those guys legitimately want Israel to turn my home into a parking lot.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›