2259
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nostalgicgamerz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

“Religious bigots get the fuck out“

[-] Alexmitter@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

European here so it may not be clear to me, but I thought discriminating against religious movements like the church or trump supporters is still illegal. Correct?

[-] SocializedHermit@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Political affiliation is not protected, religious affiliation is. It's true that the Right has been doing their level best to politicise their religious feelings into public life, so that barring Trump supporters effectively excludes Evangelicals and a majority of Catholics. This may not be their desired outcome, but perhaps they shouldn't have tied their religious sentiment to political causes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] this@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Religions are protected classes under the constitution, political groups are not. Free speech is also protected. The combination of these factors means that weather the shop keeper in OPs photo is breaking the law is entirely dependant on how you interpret the constitution, which is what the supreme court is supposed to do.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] MdRuckus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I love this! This is amazing!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2023
2259 points (94.9% liked)

Malicious Compliance

18048 readers
14 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS