That is such an idiotic take. Truly unbelievable a court would actually say something like this and acquit somebody. The judge should be open to standing in the public square and letting anybody grope him, as long as it is under 10 seconds.
Don't give him what he wants.
This is fucking disgusting.
If someone beats the fuck out of the abuser’s head with a baseball bat for 9 seconds, then tells the same judge that it was a joke, would they be acquitted?
Count to ten right now. That’s a long fucking time for an accidental grope.
The idea of putting a time limit on what constitutes a grope is dumb to begin with. But, if somehow someone decided that was the right approach, 10s is absurdly long.
There are situations where there might be some disagreement over whether something is a grope vs. an accidental touch. Say squeezing past someone at a crowded bar, or on a bus/train at rush hour. But, that contact is on the order of 1s or less. If there were going to be a time limit for groping, a more reasonable idea might be that if it's longer than 1 second, the chances of it being an accidental touch are much lower. If it's under a second, then maybe the person being accused has grounds to say that it was just an accidental touch.
This just in.. stabbing people is fine as long as you remove the knife within 10 seconds.
This is disgusting and I hope that something is done to rectify this quickly, before things get out of hand in Italy. They've basically handed every creep in the country a free pass, as long as it's a done quickly.
More like before things get in hand
Hey, he's smart, he picks up his food off the floor right away and eats it. 10 seconds rule applies everywhere, watcha know.
Dammit, my gropes last 12 seconds. Does it still count if I don't get a boner?
Gross
Welcome! This community is constantly upgrading and is a current work in progress. Please stay tuned.
/c/Worldnews@sh.itjust.works strives for high-quality standards on the latest world events.
The basis of these standards comes from the MBFC, which uses an aggregate of methodologies, including the IFCN and World Freedom Indices, to rate the Bias and Factual Reporting of News.
These are non-profit organisations with full transparency of their funding and structure. Likewise, this community is also transparent – Please feel free to question its staff and the overall content of this community.
Does your post fit the standards? Check this thread!
Rules:
Disallowed submissions
~~US internal news/US politics~~ (Allowed while the Fediverse grows)
Editorialised titles
Editorials, opinions, analysis
Feature stories
Non-English articles
Images, videos or audio clips -- General Social media posts (Only Allowed during ongoing world events)
Petitions, advocacy, surveys
All-caps words in titles
Blogs
Old news (≥ 1-Month-old) articles
Memes/GIFs
Unlabeled NSFW images/videos
URL shorteners
Paywalls (Copy-Pasting the Article content or bypassing the paywall is allowed)
Commenters will receive one public warning with only one strike if violating any of the following rules:
Celebrating death/Advocating violence
Genocide denial/downplaying genocide
Disinformation/misinformation
Health disinformation/misinformation
Bigotry / Other offensive content Personal attacks on other users
The general rules of the sh.itjust.works instance apply!
Thank you.
todo list:
Automate a bot to check standards
Introduce tl;dr bot
Gain more moderators