1
9
submitted 1 month ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/psychology@lemmy.ml
2
3
'Askers' vs. 'Guessers' (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 3 months ago by MelonYellow@lemmy.ca to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/19879638

'Askers' vs. 'Guessers'

Are you an asker or a guesser? Short interesting read.

3
-1
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by Classy@sh.itjust.works to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

I was curious about how one can begin to understand their child's sense of ToM. I've felt like my child is maybe a bit above the curve in terms of mental development (he is already capable of saying maybe 50-60 words, including names of 5 people and one dog, at 18 months old. He can also combine words to make contextually appropriate statements (for example: if I'm getting my coat on, he might say "daddy bye-bye" as if to say "Dad is leaving"). If he doesn't see his mother he might just say "mom-mom?" while raising his arms in the universal "who knows?" position—or he will say "mom-mom gone". I've been around several 18mos and it seems atypical to me that they're capable of these things so early.

Well today he did something interesting. When he sits on the potty he likes to read a book, and just a few minutes ago I closed the door so I could go to the bathroom, and he slid a book under the bathroom door. Is it just automatic? Or is he forming some prototypical sense of "I like to read when I'm on the toilet, so I'll bring one for him since he is on the toilet"?

Edit: I seem to have riled up some negative emotions in the readers on this community, for what reason I have no idea, but for what it's worth: I'm not trying to just brag about my child. If he's average that's awesome. I'm just trying to give context on what I see my kid does and use that to maybe try to understand how his mind works. It's a fascinating subject to me.

4
12
submitted 10 months ago by Leminl@lemdro.id to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

My post was removed because I put it in the wrong category/community sorry for that,

5
1
Aldous Huxley's Deep Reflection (thereader.mitpress.mit.edu)
submitted 11 months ago by Voyager@psychedelia.ink to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

Huxley was a very special kind of expert witness to his own unusual states of consciousness, which he actively cultivated in the service of his writing.

6
1
submitted 11 months ago by Spzi@lemm.ee to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/5320372

The strange science experiment that blew a worm’s head off… and blew our minds.

This interview is an episode from /channel/UCz7Gx6wLCiPw3F-AmXUvH8w, our publication about ideas that inspire a life well-lived, created with the /channel/UCMJ6QeJUbCUuhOSYZadF7sA.

Michael Levin, a developmental biologist at Tufts University, challenges conventional notions of intelligence, arguing that it is inherently collective rather than individual.

Levin explains that we are collections of cells, with each cell possessing competencies developed from their evolution from unicellular organisms. This forms a multi-scale competency architecture, where each level, from cells to tissues to organs, is solving problems within their unique spaces.

Levin emphasizes that properly recognizing intelligence, which spans different scales of existence, is vital for understanding life's complexities. And this perspective suggests a radical shift in understanding ourselves and the world around us, acknowledging the cognitive abilities present at every level of our existence.

Read the video transcript ► https://bigthink.com/the-well/intelligence-can-cells-think/?utm_source=youtube&utm_medium=video&utm_campaign=youtube_description

7
6
submitted 1 year ago by Gsus4@feddit.nl to c/psychology@lemmy.ml

We are familiar with the social "id" through mob dynamics, crowd control. But is there anything akin to the ego and superego for society or groups? Maybe the media act as a bit of a superego on societies...but maybe the concept just does not extend that easily.

8
-1

Lately I have been hearing the term "cognitive dissonance" being used a fair amount. I am checking my understanding of it so please bare with me and feel free to correct me if I am wrong. My understanding of the term is that it refers to someone who continues to hold on to their core beliefs despite overwhelming incontrovertible evidence that their beliefs are patently wrong.

9
1

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.perthchat.org/post/184069

All I found with citations was that it's best to wait until marriage before cohabitation, but that boomer talk ain't gonna happen for zoomers.

Otherwise, 1 article said "wait as long as possible" but I need a month/year number lmao.

Psychology

410 readers
1 users here now

A place for articles, discussions and questions about psychology – the science of mind and behavior. It is a multidisciplinary field, covering behavioral, cognitive, developmental, educational, neuro-biological, personality, and social studies (and more!).


Rules:

  1. Do not take or give direct medical advice in your posts or comments.
  2. Absolutely no bigotry, hate speech or discrimination. That includes (but is not limited to) ableism, antisemitism, islamophobia, queer*- and LGBTQIA*-phobia, racism, and sexism.
  3. Keep discussions in good faith and be respectful.
  4. Posts should be related to academic, applied or clinical psychology in some way.
  5. Titles should be relevant to the content and not misleading.
  6. Do not post links to your own surveys, spam or self-help tips/videos.

Friends and related communities:


Banner: "A cross section of a mouse brain stained with cortical layer specific proteins" by Mamunur Rashid, CC BY 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons / height edited to fit as banner

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS