11
submitted 5 months ago by booja@booja.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 12 points 5 months ago

So if we need to grow our population to 100M by 2100 in order to have nice things, what happens when we reach that goal? Would we finally be able to have nice things with that population or would Mr Wiseman Prime say we need to grow our population to 200M by 2200 in order to have nice things? If yes, then it's clearly not possible to have nice things under this model. If no, then we don't need to grow our population to 100M in order to have nice things. And by we I mean the majority of Canadians, the workers. I do understand that Mr Wiseman cannot get a lot more nice things from the current population.

I'm loosing my fucking mind when listening to people able to ignore so much of reality while making sweeping policy agendas that will drastically affect the reality of most Canadians.

[-] nik282000@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 months ago

Mr Wiseman Prime say we need to grow our population to 200M by 2200

That wouldn't keep the line going up. He would probably say 1B by 2200.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 0 points 5 months ago

drevil-pinky.gif

this post was submitted on 01 Apr 2024
11 points (66.7% liked)

Canada

7106 readers
306 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS