20
If you $100m-fraud on the blockchain, you $100m-fraud in real life
(www.justice.gov)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)
Buttcoin
399 readers
3 users here now
Buttcoin is the future of online butts. Buttcoin is a peer-to-peer butt. Peer-to-peer means that no central authority issues new butts or tracks butts.
A community for hurling ordure at cryptocurrency/blockchain dweebs of all sorts. We are only here for debate as long as it amuses us. Meme stocks are also on topic.
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
You see, this is the one instance where I am completely on the grifter's side.
So is code law or not? How dare they prosecute him for the undeniable immutable truth of the blockchain? They even passed a resolution in their stupid DAO that they wouldn't!
I fucking hate libertartian hypocrisy of actively opposing any and all regulations, but running to the Man when they get screwed. You setup the stupid game, you're responsible for the stupid prices. If anyone should be sued here it's the fucks that created Mango with this vulnerability and allowed this hack in the first place. That shit isn't even real money!
Absolutely childish behaviour, reminds me of people in fucking elementary school that would run crying to the teacher after losing a bet because "they weren't for real" and "just kidding". I guess I shouldn't expect more from a community whose basically first order of business was calling backsies because they were on base or whatever the fuck.
it's even better than that - Avi had previously filed suits against other DeFi entities for market manipulation. The DoJ used this fact as evidence that he knew damn well that what he did here was illegal.
Eisenberg also fits certain libertarian stereotypes.
ok nvm then, everyone here is terrible and I hope they stub their little toe every day in perpetuity