-2
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
-2 points (44.4% liked)
Conservative
403 readers
66 users here now
A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff
-
Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.
-
We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.
-
Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.
A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
That is an infringment on firearms. There are to no restrictions. Private ciztens bought canons. American citizens are free to manufacture and sell ghost guns.
The Bill of Rights do not mention limits, the Consititutions do not mention limits, there are no limits. People are free to racial slurs, people are free make and sell ghost guns, people are free insult and mock homosexuals.
Define what is a hate crime that everybody would recognize and agree.
I reject laws, except for homicide and kidnapping. It can be legal to commit evil, and illegal to do a good act.
If someone does something that is not bad but deemed illegal, I would protect them from the law to protect morality. If someone I know carries concealed firearms, that is moral and just. If an intruder breaks into someone's house, the resident has an obligation to kill the intruder immediately. I help those kinds of people to hide if the law contradicts morality
Freedom to express any opinion a person decides because no opinion or words causes bodiy injuries, only actions do.
I disregard their opinion, and I live in complete absence of their decision. I have no regard for restriction and I will provide material support to everyone that goes against it.
"Judges shouldn't be allowed to ignore laws" and "I disregard the opinion of the supreme court" is some grade A cognitive dissonance. Just chef's kiss
I never said judges shouldn't be allowed to ignore laws.
Judges have an obligation to ignore all laws that are immoral aand unjust. Laws are only for protecting the citizens. There are to be no laws ever protecting governments. The citizens are to be protect from the government.