1243
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] dan@upvote.au 0 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

what they did to LXD

I still don't understand what LXD does that LXC doesn't do. LXC is significantly more popular. All the major control panels (like Proxmox, SolusVM, Virtualizor, etc) support OpenVZ or LXC but not LXD.

[-] lemmyreader@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

Okay.I'm not going to argue about this but here's a description : https://packages.debian.org/bookworm/lxd

[-] dan@upvote.au 1 points 3 months ago

I'm not trying to argue? I legitimately don't know what advantages LXD has since I don't see it used widely in the industry, whereas LXC is everywhere.

[-] 3w0 2 points 3 months ago

LXD is to LXC what Podman or Distrobox is to Docker (if I'm correct, it's just a convenient wrapper that does extra bits/builds on LXC)

[-] lengau@midwest.social 1 points 3 months ago

LXD also has some cool features like launching VMs in a way that's nearly indistinguishable from containers, which can be useful if you need to do something like run a distro that uses cgroups v1 (e.g. CentOS 7) on a more modern distro.

[-] 3w0 2 points 3 months ago

Yep I was trying to remember, it's been a long time since I used it!

this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2024
1243 points (97.6% liked)

linuxmemes

20363 readers
780 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS