55
submitted 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) by coffeeClean@infosec.pub to c/cybersecurity@infosec.pub

I plugged into ethernet (as wifi w/captive portal does not work for me). I think clearnet worked but I have no interest in that. Egress Tor traffic was blocked and so was VPN. I’m not interested in editing all my scripts and configs to use clearnet, so the library’s internet is useless to me (unless I bother to try a tor bridge).

I was packing my laptop and a librarian spotted me unplugging my ethernet cable and approached me with big wide open eyes and pannicked angry voice (as if to be addressing a child that did something naughty), and said “you can’t do that!”

I have a lot of reasons for favoring ethernet, like not carrying a mobile phone that can facilitate the SMS verify that the library’s captive portal imposes, not to mention I’m not eager to share my mobile number willy nilly. The reason I actually gave her was that that I run a free software based system and the wifi drivers or firmware are proprietary so my wifi card doesn’t work¹. She was also worried that I was stealing an ethernet cable and I had to explain that I carry an ethernet cable with me, which she struggled to believe for a moment. When I said it didn’t work, she was like “good, I’m not surprised”, or something like that.

¹ In reality, I have whatever proprietary garbage my wifi NIC needs, but have a principled objection to a service financed by public money forcing people to install and execute proprietary non-free software on their own hardware. But there’s little hope for getting through to a librarian in the situation at hand, whereby I might as well have been caught disassembling their PCs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] coffeeClean@infosec.pub -5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Could I be in the wrong? No, it must be literally everyone else in this entire thread / national library network.

Is your position so weak that you need to resort to a bandwagon fallacy?

Grow up.

and an ad hominem?

You demonstrate being a grown up by avoiding ad hominems in favor of logically sound reasoning.

[-] null@slrpnk.net 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Is your position so weak that you need to resort to a bandwagon fallacy?

It's not a fallacy. Your social skills are toxic and that's been confirmed by everyone here. You aren't in a position to judge how your actions are perceived by society.

If everyone says you're being an asshole, you're being an asshole.

and an ad hominem?

This isn't a formal debate. It's me and everyone else booing you for your bad behavior.

this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
55 points (63.8% liked)

cybersecurity

3221 readers
7 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Community Rules

Enjoy!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS