137
submitted 4 months ago by Zotora@programming.dev to c/privacy@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de -2 points 4 months ago

"Self-inflicted". If you don't comply, we'll break your computer, and that's your fault. Why did you make us do that???

[-] lud@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago

It's a security feature. Microsoft is not breaking anything. It's the sysadmin that could accidentally break their own stuff if they don't set it up correctly.

They don't even have to set it up if they don't want too.

[-] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

These critics have never contended with networks of thousands of workstations/users.

This will be a massive help in the SMB space, where you can't lock down machines as much as you do in Enterprise, and end-users don't have the support of a large help desk.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
137 points (90.5% liked)

Privacy

31161 readers
469 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS