108
submitted 4 months ago by ptz@dubvee.org to c/audiobooks@literature.cafe

I definitely do not want to support this practice, but there's no way to filter these out 😠.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ptz@dubvee.org 5 points 4 months ago

Lol, there is no sweetening the deal. Every one of those is a lost job opportunity for an actual voice actor.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Except many books get read by the author or never get read at all so it opens new opportunities for people who wouldn't ever use audio books or books who never will get audio version now vision impaired people have the option to hear them.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 7 points 4 months ago

TTS already exists for the visually impaired. Amazon can use AI voices for that all they want (they're better than the default TTS now). Just don't sell me an "audiobook" that's not read by a person.

[-] JackiesFridge@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

How about opening up new opportunities for real (if unknown) voice actors to read these books for people?

[-] admin@lemmy.my-box.dev -1 points 4 months ago

There'd be a market for that, just like there's a market for handmade furniture.

this post was submitted on 06 May 2024
108 points (99.1% liked)

Audiobooks

224 readers
1 users here now

For talk of all things audiobook related!

Please follow this instances rules.

To find more communities on this instance, go to: !411@literature.cafe

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS