116
Prison for cybersecurity expert selling private videos from inside 400,000 homes
(www.bitdefender.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
116 points (99.2% liked)
Cybersecurity
5396 readers
55 users here now
c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.
THE RULES
Instance Rules
- Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- No Ads / Spamming.
- No pornography.
Community Rules
- Idk, keep it semi-professional?
- Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
- Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.
If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.
Learn about hacking
Other security-related communities !databreaches@lemmy.zip !netsec@lemmy.world !cybersecurity@lemmy.capebreton.social !securitynews@infosec.pub !netsec@links.hackliberty.org !cybersecurity@infosec.pub !pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
Notable mention to !cybersecuritymemes@lemmy.world
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
While thats clearly fucked, its also a great example of why those devices should never be connected to WAN if at all possible
Anything with a camera or mic especially. My thermostat, don't really care
You could use thermostat data to get a record of when a person is and isn't in their home, which is also pretty sensitive information
A separate wifi network may still be connected to WAN. The only benefit to separating from your usual wifi network is to minimize the attack surface for a bad actor to access other devices on your network. But that's not the topic being discussed here.
If you're suggesting that the separate wifi network not be exposed to WAN, but to be LAN only, then yes that's one possible solution to avoiding exposing these devices to WAN, which is exactly what we suggested. But thanks for your input, dolt.
Yup. I want a home monitoring service, but I'm too lazy to go wire up my house with Ethernet, and there's no way I'm buying anything Wi-Fi. I worked with cameras at work for years, and I know how awful their security is.
So I have no surveillance at home. I think I'm probably safer with no surveillance than insecure surveillance...